Talk:Christmas Scandal

Christmas Scandal has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Christmas Scandal is part of the Parks and Recreation (season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 16, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
January 18, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 25, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that "Christmas Scandal", an episode of NBC's comedy series Parks and Recreation, marked the last in a string of guest performances by stand-up comedian Louis C.K.?

Current status: Good article

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Holidays: Christmas Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Christmas task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Christmas Scandal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 18:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am reviewing this article and became hung up on this in the plot: "Soon after, Ann is horrified to discover that a news crew secretly followed Dexhart to her home and took a photograph of the meeting, resulting in speculation that Ann is Leslie's lesbian lover." Isn't Dexhart a guy? Why was Dexhart at Ann's home, and why does that show that Ann is Leslies's lesbian lover? (Sorry for being so dense.)

Not dense at all, I didn't explain it clearly enough. Is it better now? — Hun ter Ka hn 19:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"who revised his recurring role as Dave Sanderson" - do you mean reprised his recurring role?
- Yep. I fixed it. — Hun ter Ka hn 19:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Commentators said NBC may have been received a boost in the ratings due to repeats on ABC on December 10" - how do repeats increase ratings?
- I tried to clarify. — Hun ter Ka hn 19:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"but was kept together by a number of strong comedic moments and subplot, including the parks department splitting Leslie's work, the April and Andy subplot and the scenes between Leslie and Dave" - could you clarify this?
- Better? — Hun ter Ka hn 19:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Xtzou (Talk) 19:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! — Hun ter Ka hn 19:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you clarified everything. Nice work. Xtzou (Talk) 19:51, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 19:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]