Talk:Church Army

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Church Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100323062105/http://www.ncvys.org.uk:80/ to http://www.ncvys.org.uk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:38, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Updating out-dated information
Hi folks

Church Army no longer hold Church Army Sunday and training has changed.

I have a conflict of interest as I work for Church Army so am not able to edit the page.

Would someone consider changing the Church Army Sunday paragraph to something like this please:

''The Vision of Church Army is "For everyone everywhere to encounter God’s love, and be empowered to transform their communities through faith shared in words and action." It does this through a wide range of work through Centres of Mission and through projects like the Marylebone Project for homeless women in London. '' And training with this (line 52):

''Each Church Army Society is responsible for the training of its staff. In some situations, students are paired with evangelists currently serving in the field; others attend residential schooling. Between 1965 and 1991 the Wilson Carlile Training College was at 27 Vanburgh Park, Blackheath, where the premises included the Church Army Chapel. In the modern Church Army training is co-ordinated through the Wilson Carlile Centre in Sheffield and allows evangelists in training to remain as practitioners in their local communities.''

Also, our convention is not to prefix "Church Army" with "The" so this should be removed where possible.

Thank you

Captain Neil Thomson (Church Army) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NeilThomsonCA (talk • contribs) 10:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Reply 30-MAR-2019
Regards, Spintendo  11:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Local consensus appears to be that the information entered by the COI editor on line 52 is not to be retained. I'm afraid that an edit request alone cannot surmount this opposition.
 * Discussion with local editors is the preferred route to achieving compromise, however other options for dispute resolution are open to you, should you wish to consider them.