Talk:Claire Underwood/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 05:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Nominator: TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. -- Seabuckthorn   ♥  05:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written
 * a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

Check for WP:LEAD:


 * 1) Check for Correct Structure of Lead Section:  ✅
 * 2) Check for Citations (WP:LEADCITE):  ✅
 * 3) Check for Introductory text:  ✅
 * 4) * Check for Provide an accessible overview (MOS:INTRO): ✅
 * 5) ** Major Point 1: Description "She is the wife of … from which the current series is derived." (summarised well in the lead)
 * 6) ** Major Point 2: Reception "The role has been critically acclaimed … for this role at the 65th Primetime Emmy Awards." (summarised well in the lead)
 * 7) * Check for Relative emphasis: ✅
 * 8) ** Major Point 1: Description "She is the wife of … from which the current series is derived." (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body)
 * 9) ** Major Point 2: Reception " The role has been critically acclaimed … for this role at the 65th Primetime Emmy Awards." (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body)
 * 10) * Check for Opening paragraph (MOS:BEGIN): ✅
 * 11) ** Check for First sentence (WP:LEADSENTENCE): ✅
 * 12) *** Claire Underwood is a fictional character from the Netflix web television web series House of Cards played by Robin Wright.
 * 13) ** Check for Format of the first sentence (MOS:BOLDTITLE): ✅
 * 14) ** Check for Proper names and titles: ✅
 * 15) ** Check for Abbreviations and synonyms (MOS:BOLDSYN): None
 * 16) ** Check for Foreign language (MOS:FORLANG): None
 * 17) ** Check for Pronunciation: None
 * 18) ** Check for Contextual links (MOS:CONTEXTLINK): ✅
 * 19) ** Check for Biographies: NA
 * 20) ** Check for Organisms: NA
 * 21) Check for Biographies of living persons:  NA
 * 22) Check for Alternative names (MOS:LEADALT):  ✅
 * 23) * Check for Non-English titles:
 * 24) * Check for Usage in first sentence:
 * 25) * Check for Separate section usage:
 * 26) Check for Length (WP:LEADLENGTH):  ✅
 * 27) Check for Clutter (WP:LEADCLUTTER):  None

✅

Check for WP:LAYOUT: ✅


 * 1) Check for Body sections: WP:BODY, MOS:BODY.  ✅
 * 2) * Check for Headings and sections: ✅
 * 3) * Check for Section templates and summary style: ✅
 * 4) * Check for Paragraphs (MOS:PARAGRAPHS): ✅
 * 5) ** Paragraphs should be short enough to be readable, but long enough to develop an idea. (WP:BETTER)
 * 6) ** Fix short paragraphs.
 * 7) Check for Standard appendices and footers (MOS:APPENDIX):  ✅
 * 8) * Check for Order of sections (WP:ORDER): ✅
 * 9) * Check for Works or publications: ✅
 * 10) * Check for See also section (MOS:SEEALSO): None
 * 11) * Check for Notes and references (WP:FNNR): ✅
 * 12) * Check for Further reading (WP:FURTHER): None
 * 13) * Check for External links (WP:LAYOUTEL): None
 * 14) * Check for Links to sister projects: None
 * 15) * Check for Navigation templates: ✅
 * 16) Check for Formatting:  ✅
 * 17) * Check for Images (WP:LAYIM): ✅
 * 18) * Check for Links: ✅
 * 19) * Check for Horizontal rule (WP:LINE): ✅

✅

Check for WP:WTW: ✅


 * 1) Check for Words that may introduce bias:  ✅
 * 2) * Check for Puffery (WP:PEA): ✅
 * 3) * Check for Contentious labels (WP:LABEL): ✅
 * 4) * Check for Unsupported attributions (WP:WEASEL): ✅
 * 5) * Check for Expressions of doubt (WP:ALLEGED): ✅
 * 6) * Check for Editorializing (MOS:OPED): ✅
 * 7) * Check for Synonyms for said (WP:SAY): ✅
 * 8) Check for Expressions that lack precision:  ✅
 * 9) * Check for Euphemisms (WP:EUPHEMISM): ✅
 * 10) * Check for Clichés and idioms (WP:IDIOM): ✅
 * 11) * Check for Relative time references (WP:REALTIME): ✅
 * 12) * Check for Neologisms (WP:PEA): None
 * 13) Check for Offensive material (WP:F***):  ✅

Check for WP:MOSFICT: ✅


 * 1) Check for Real-world perspective (WP:Real world):  ✅
 * 2) * Check for Primary and secondary information (WP:PASI): ✅
 * 3) * Check for Contextual presentation (MOS:PLOT): ✅

None


 * Prose is preferred over list (WP:PROSE):
 * Check for Tables (MOS:TABLES):

2: Verifiable with no original research
 * a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
 * b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google.)

✅

Check for WP:RS: ✅


 * 1) Check for the material (WP:RSVETTING):  (not contentious) ✅
 * 2) * Is it contentious?: No
 * 3) * Does the ref indeed support the material?:
 * 4) Check for the author (WP:RSVETTING):  ✅
 * 5) * Who is the author?:
 * 6) ** Stelter, Brian (The New York Times)
 * 7) ** Cornet, Roth (IGN)
 * 8) ** Bennett, Laura (New Republic)
 * 9) ** Stuever, Hank (The Independent)
 * 10) ** (The Denver Post)
 * 11) ** Stanley, Alessandra (The New York Times)
 * 12) ** Poniewozik, James (Time)
 * 13) ** deWolf Smith, Nancy (The Wall Street Journal)
 * 14) ** Lacob, Jace (The Daily Beast)
 * 15) ** Farley, Christopher John (The Wall Street Journal)
 * 16) ** Zurawik, David (The Baltimore Sun)
 * 17) ** Hyman, Vicki (NJ.com)
 * 18) * Does the author have a Wikipedia article?:
 * 19) * What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience?:
 * 20) * What else has the author published?:
 * 21) * Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works?:
 * 22) Check for the publication (WP:RSVETTING):  ✅
 * 23) * The New York Times
 * 24) * IGN
 * 25) * New Republic
 * 26) * The Independent
 * 27) * The Denver Post
 * 28) * Time
 * 29) * The Daily Beast
 * 30) * The Wall Street Journal
 * 31) * The Baltimore Sun
 * 32) * NJ.com
 * 33) Check for Self-published sources (WP:SPS):

✅

Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: ✅


 * 1) Check for Direct quotations:  ✅
 * 2) Check for Likely to be challenged:  ✅
 * 3) Check for Contentious material about living persons (WP:BLP):  NA


 * c. No original research: ✅

✅


 * 1) Check for primary sources (WP:PRIMARY):  ✅
 * 2) Check for synthesis (WP:SYN):  ✅
 * 3) Check for original images (WP:OI):  ✅

3: Broad in its coverage

✅


 * 1) Check for Article scope as defined by reliable sources:
 * 2) Check for The extent of the subject matter in these RS:
 * 3) Check for Out of scope:
 * 4) Check for The range of material that belongs in the article:
 * 5) Check for All material that is notable is covered:
 * 6) Check for All material that is referenced is covered:
 * 7) Check for All material that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope is covered:
 * 8) Check for The most general scope that summarises essentially all knowledge:
 * 9) Check for Stay on topic and no wandering off-topic (WP:OFFTOPIC):

✅


 * 1) Check for Readability issues (WP:LENGTH):
 * 2) Check for Article size (WP:TOO LONG!):

4: Neutral

✅

4. Fair representation without bias: ✅


 * 1) Check for POV (WP:YESPOV):  ✅
 * 2) Check for naming (WP:POVNAMING):  ✅
 * 3) Check for structure (WP:STRUCTURE):  ✅
 * 4) Check for Due and undue weight (WP:DUE):  ✅
 * 5) Check for Balancing aspects (WP:BALASPS):  ✅
 * 6) Check for Giving "equal validity" (WP:VALID):  ✅
 * 7) Check for Balance (WP:YESPOV):  ✅
 * 8) Check for Impartial tone (WP:IMPARTIAL):  ✅
 * 9) Check for Describing aesthetic opinions (WP:SUBJECTIVE):  ✅
 * 10) Check for Words to watch (WP:YESPOV):  ✅
 * 11) Check for Attributing and specifying biased statements (WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV):  ✅
 * 12) Check for Fringe theories and pseudoscience (WP:PSCI):  None
 * 13) Check for Religion (WP:RNPOV):  None

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes

6: Images (None)

NA

6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:


 * 1) Check for copyright tags (WP:TAGS):
 * 2) Check for copyright status:
 * 3) Check for non-free content (WP:NFC):
 * 4) Check for valid fair use rationales (WP:FUR):

6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:


 * 1) Check for image relevance (WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE):
 * 2) Check for Images for the lead (WP:LEADIMAGE):
 * 3) Check for suitable captions (WP:CAPTION):

As per the above checklist, the issues are :
 * Fix short paragraphs.
 * Done.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:20, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

This article is a very promising GA nominee. I'm delighted to see your work here. I'm putting the article on hold. All the best! -- Seabuckthorn   ♥  15:37, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

OK, everything looks good now. Passing the article to GA status. -- Seabuckthorn   ♥  14:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)