Talk:Cleversafe

Untitled

 * I just updated the Cleversafe page and updated the references to correct the notability issues. Can someone please review and let me know if the updates are adequate?

Crystalgettemyjones (talk) 17:19, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed Cleversafe Edits
My name is Dorinne Hoss and I am a Marketing Manager at Cleversafe. I would like to update the Cleversafe page with some new information. I welcome feedback on the proposed changes.

Proposed Change to Number of Employees: 65

Proposed Addition to History Section:

In 2010, Cleversafe announced an investment and development agreement with In-Q-Tel that will enable Cleversafe’s storage platform to be used in deployments supporting the United States Intelligence Community.

Proposed Addition to Awards Section:


 * Execullence Award for Best Disruptive Technology 2011

Proposed changes to the following sections will be forthcoming:
 * Products
 * Open Source

--DorinneHoss (talk) 18:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Notability Warning
This is Crystal from Cleversafe. I’d like to discuss the possibility of removing the notability warning atop this article. I tried to fix our references previously, but unfortunately I made some errors in following the community guidelines. I would like to rectify this mistake. Overall, we believe that the company meets the notability guidelines. Below are some recent articles featuring Cleversafe. Can the necessity of the notability warning be re-evaluated on this basis?

Forbes

http://www.forbes.com/sites/brucerogers/2014/03/19/chris-gladwins-cleversafe-seeks-to-lead-the-100-petabyte-storage-market/

The Wall Street Journal

http://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2014/08/27/miami-marlins-adopt-new-storage-technology-for-video-age/

Information Week

http://www.informationweek.com/strategic-cio/executive-insights-and-innovation/nurturing-its-next-generation-chicago-style-/d/d-id/1252693?page_number=1

http://www.informationweek.com/big-data/big-data-analytics/think-todays-data-is-big-wait-10-years/d/d-id/1113883

Crystalgettemyjones (talk) 18:58, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Notabiility is no longer the issue. I have updated the warning templates to reflect the current issues with the article. Feel free to make the changes yourself if you can be objective and avoid WP:POV, WP:ADVERT and WP:COI.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing this. Near as I can tell, directly editing this article would be a big no-no. Also, since few folks have stopped by here, it would just look bad if the main editor of the article was no less than a company representative. Where do you recommend I go? WikiProject: Technology, maybe? Mpascual312 (talk) 14:52, 21 October 2014 (UTC)