Talk:Climate stabilization wedge

RE: Criticism
Have any actual economists weighed in? Connaughton and a utility engineer don't exactly seem like unbiased sources.

Light edits but more needed
I've done some minimal editing to reframe the "wedge game" as something a bit more serious - the concept is well regarded in academia and the original article by Pacala and Socolow has more than 2,000 citations. So it's more than just a game, it's also a valid approach to climate change mitigation. Still, I am not entirely happy with my edits, so more are welcome!Bksovacool (talk) 07:50, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and in my view, the article title should be Climate stabilization wedge, with a subsection discussing the game, rather than the other way around. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 10:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Climate stabilization wedge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080717050309/http://www.princeton.edu/wedges/Stabilization_Wedges_Game_w8_Oct07.pdf to http://www.princeton.edu/wedges/Stabilization_Wedges_Game_w8_Oct07.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)