Talk:Coco peat

Coir
Should this article be merged with coir? Minvaren 17:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No. While cocopeat is sometimes called coir by end users, cocopeat is actually the by product of coir or coconut fiber industries. Ediwill 08:45, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * On the other hand I have noted many sentences in Wikipedia's Coir page where cocopeat is referred to as coir. Ediwill 02:00, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

If we were to refer to "wheatmaize" would this mean wheat is actually maize ? Cocopeat is definitely not peat - referring to the byproduct of the coconut in such a manner is deceiving to say the least197.87.173.208 (talk) 11:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Cocopeat providers
Cocopeat providers is spammed all over the page. I've removed them. Mitheral (talk) 19:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'll request the link be blacklisted if they continue. --Ronz (talk) 01:40, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

typo
The word hydroponic in the sentence below is wrong. It should be either hydrophilic or hydrophobic I would guess. Hydroponic refers to a soiless growing method not a property of Coco. Although cocopeat is used in hydroponic gardens itself it is not hydroponic.

Coco is hydroponic so it is highly recommended not to let coco/coco soil mixes to dry out.Coco is porous and cannot be overwatered easily. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.184.76 (talk) 19:20, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Coco Peat → Coco peat –

Per WP:CAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony  (talk)  08:34, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Support. Makes sense, if I had noticed I might have just made the move as non-controversial. -- Donald Albury 12:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.