Talk:Congressional Baseball Game

I added the Outdated as of template
But I don't know how to correctly use it. Please advise. lol md4 U&#124;T 13:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Removed, since been updated. See my talk for more details. Sky  Warrior  15:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Copyright Issues
Many of the sections are copy/past of this page and other pages listed on the site: http://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/Baseball-Game/Statistics/

While this is a government website not subject to copyright, it should probably be edited to be unique to Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blazingliberty (talk • contribs) 19:05, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit reversion
You recently reverted my edit. The text I copyedited was not a section hatnote, which in any case should be formatted correctly (e.g. with for). The purpose of a WP:HATNOTE is "to help readers locate a different article if the one they are at is not the one they're looking for". That text did not do that. Formatting it to appear like a section hatnote is further misleading the reader into thinking that the link is to an article. I have a long-term project to correct occurrences in Enwiki of inappropriate hatnote-like text, of which this is an example: in fact there are two instances in this article and I seem to have missed the other one. If you can find a better way of incorporating a call on these footnotes into the article then that would be a welcome improvement, but formatting something to look like a hatnote when it isn't is not acceptable. Regards, and thanks for your editing, 07:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Shhhnotsoloud (talk)
 * Thanks for the extra info. Based on your explanation, I've reworked the faux hatnotes into inline text. —ADavidB 16:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * . Perfect, thank you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)