Talk:Convenience

list
list is ridiculous. public convenience... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.32.239.181 (talk • contribs) 18.44, December 31, 2006

The list was just silly so I removed it. 194.9.254.241 14:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg
Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibility of AfD
This article seems like an obvious lexical entry and might be a candidate for deletion as per WP:Notability and WP:What Wikipedia is not. There's also the fact that 90% of it's content is blatant OR and none of it is sourced. "Service convenience" -- currently an (undeveloped) subtopic of the page -- seems like it could be a viable focus for an article. Perhaps a rename and reworking is in order? Snow (talk) 11:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Probably you haven't noticed it was nominated for deletion just a few days ago and the outcome was a clear keep. The article currently shows a list of additional sources you can use to expand it. Regards, Cavarrone (talk) 11:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I did miss that. The tag must have merged with the one above it when I scanned the page, though I did wonder how the item came to be listed in article rescue.  Thanks for the head's up. Snow (talk) 21:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

merge convenience - modern convenience
convenience is not a new concept, but all examples in both articles concern modern industrialized civilization. besides, there is a sort of "historic" outline in the modern conveniences article. -- Kku 13:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 12:55, 7 August 2018 (UTC)