Talk:Cutter Consortium

Talk:Cutter Consortium

I just reauthored a Cutter Consortium entry to replace the original entry that was deleted on November 21, 2006. The new page is not a marketing piece (admittedly, the old one was), and is consciously NPOV (though there's always room for improvement, I know.) If you scan the category "List of research companies", many other companies in the space have had their listings deleted for the same reason the Cutter one was. But others are still there. If they still appear and Cutter does not, Wikipedia is less useful and complete than it would be otherwise.

Thanks for your consideration and your work on this -- talk amongst yourselves... Kimleonard 19:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)Kim Leonard


 * It seems unavoidable that those who are associated with an enterprise are unable to see their own work as being promotional and advertorial. You feel this is not a marketing piece. I would disagree. I will admit that there are other articles with similar problems that have not been removed, but one bad article never justifies another. (P.S. A truly encyclopedic article would never contain the buzzword-fest that is the Corporate Goals section.) Fan-1967 20:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Appreciate your feedback -- Corporate Goals is gone. I absolutely agree that one bad article doesn't justify another. Working on making this a good one. Kimleonard 20:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)kim leonard

There's an erroneous link under the Cutter home page link -- REDIRECT: Environmental Quality Management. It's unrelated to Cutter. But when I try to edit it out, it doesn't show up in the wiki entry. Can someone help me out here? Thanks. User:KimleonardKimleonard 18:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)