Talk:DJ Screw

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kingha94.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled
'' The following are tribute albums or fake albums with DJ Screw's name on them (not real DJ Screw albums):

Italic text'' Added:
 * 1) "Screw Tape In the Deck 1"
 * 2) "Screw Tape In the Deck 2"
 * 3) "Screw Tape In the Deck 3. The Final Chapter"
 * 4) "Syrup City Ballas"
 * 5) "Soldiers United 4 Cash Series"
 * 6) "Soldiers United 4 Cash Platinum Edition"
 * 7) "Unconditional Love (Screwed)"


 * 1) 3 N' the Mornin' Part 1
 * 2) All Work, No Play
 * 3) All Screwed Up, Vol. 2

I believe All Work... and All Screwed Up, Vol. 2 are actual Screw Tapes. Am I misunderstanding the above comment? --Driscoll 00:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

All Work, No Play 3 N' the Morning Pt. 1 & 2 All Screwed up, are all commercially released Dj Screw mixes. You can buy them at most music stores (except 3 in the morning pt 1, I haven't been able to find it for years now). 3 in the morning and all screwed up are on Bigtyme Records. I'm not sure if you can get them at the Screw shop. It's a fact that Dj Screw had made 4 CD'S... "3 N Da Mornin" and "All Work No Play". When he made 3 N Da Mornin, he made part 1, part 2, high with the blanksta, and part 2 remix. There is a 2nd " All work no play" But I don't believe he(Screw) made it. He most likely mixed the songs, but didn't put it on cd's. All those Cd's that are named above, He mixed songs on the cd's, but then some other dj's wanted to slow a song or 2 down as a tribute. BY:Tiana

Screw's Birthday
User 66.25.188.76 added the following text to the article: "NOTE: DJ Screw was born in Smithsville, Texas

I have reverted the edit. If it's true can someone put it in properly. --Spondoolicks 22:37, 4 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I don't know where he was born, but "Smithsville, Texas" is not a place. Right now the article says "Smithville," a place that exists. The link below of "www.governor.state.tx.us" doesn't work. I'm not impressed by the suggestion to watch a DVD to discover his birthdate. Generally, this section of the talk is a mess. Wastrel Way (talk) Eric

He was born in san antonio, TX p http://www.governor.state.tx.us/divisions/music/tour/birthdays.htm

Birthdate incorrectly listed as June 27th. THAT IS NOT HIS BIRTHDATE. Please watch "Soldiers United 4 Cash" DVD and see the following link for the correct birthdate July 21. June 27th is the birthdate of another rapper from his click named JUT.

Workers at Screwed Up records have informed me that Screw's birthday was July 21st.

June 27th Mixtape Confusion
Big Moe clarifies confusion over his b-day in the DJ Screw: the Untold Story DVD. June 27th is BIG JUT's birthday and the name of one of the most wellirthday of D-Moe, not Big Jut, Screw, or Big Moe. If u listen to the shouts over the K-Dee "Freshest Mc" instrumental on the June 27th tape, you can hear everyone saying happy b-day to D-Moe. Big Jut was not on the June 27th tape.Djcomatoast 06:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djcomatoast 06:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)06:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

NPOV/References
I originally placed an tag on this article. I now see that the main problem is actually the lack of references, so I have replaced it with a tag.

Statements like this are obviously non-neutral however and need to be edited/removed: "rivaled if not improved upon the original songs...."

Statements like this one need to be cited: "owe much of their success to DJ Screw and give proper credit in many of their songs...." - Zepheus (ツィフィアス)

Partial Discography
How is it possible that a "partial" discography has 35 albums? Seems more like a discography than a partial one.

It's possible if you are DJ screw, there are a lot of screw tapes out there


 * Actually not including underground mixtapes this seems to be his full discography. Look up DJ Screw Discography and you'll get a list somewhere between 35 and 38 titles. Angrymansr 14:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

It's not a full discography. Look at the website of Screwed Up Records and Tapes. They sell the original, official recordings. There are more than 100 different tapes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.69.222.221 (talk) 05:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Here's the deal. DJ Screw made cassette tapes. That was the medium of choice for listening in your car in the 1990s. A whole cassette tape (120 minutes) won't fit on a CD, which holds only 80 minutes of music. So, to begin with, "discography" is not the word. Today, streaming is an option, and there is "no limit". This probably needs to be explained in the article when referring to his work. Wastrel Way (talk) Eric

Codeine Reference
Slowing down the song was supposed to recreate the effect of recreationally using Promethazine with Codeine also known as "lean" or "purple drank" in Houston parlance. This statement is incorrect Dj Screw began slowing down music long before he ever used codeine recreationally and this was not part of the vision he created. He even denounces this rumor in the soilders united for cash dvd —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Special:Contributions/ (talk)

Robert Davis
Birth name: robert davis Age:unknown —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertdavis11 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

College project reviews
This article is the subject of a college project, per School and university projects. The following items all relate to that project. —C.Fred (talk) 01:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Comment
Well-written: its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard;

The information presented in this page about DJ Screw is very informative and well-written. Aside from a few grammatical errors, I am always interested in reading biographies and this page does nice job of synthesizing the life of DJ Screw.

Comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context [and what might be missing?]

By no means does this lack information about the accomplishments and related works that DJ Screw compiled throughout his lifetime. Perhaps there could be a new section that talks about some of DJ Screw’s “screw-tapes” to give an idea of how DJ Screw compiled his tapes. A quick fix to this would be to link the term ‘djing’ to another Wikipedia page titled ‘disc jockey.’ While this is a popular term, it may help readers understand the nature of work that DJ Screw was involved with. Nevertheless, this page does a great job providing a background story of how DJ Screw got involved with his work and how his mother’s music collection had a profound impact on his tapes.

Well-researched: it is characterized by a thorough and representative survey of relevant literature on the topic. Claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported with citations; this requires a "References" section in which sources are listed, complemented by inline citations where appropriate; [are there a variety of sources/viewpoints?]

Although there are only 7 references provided in this page, the information provided is reflective of reliable sources. On the other hand, as noted at the top of the page, additional sources are needed to enhance and verify some of the information provided. If all of the information presented in the page is also found in any of the 7 sources presented, than one quick fix for this could be to add additional ‘inline citations’ immediately following the facts presented in the page opposed to adding the citation at the end of the section.

Neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias

After reading through this page, I did not notice any biased information or subjective opinions. In terms of DJ Screw’s “screw-tapes,” are there any critiques available that could be referenced in this page? Perhaps this information could be included under the ‘legacy’ section as similar information has been included.

Formatted appropriately: it follows Wikipedia style guidelines.

For the most part, the layout of the page is in alignment with the style guidelines of Wikipedia with the exception of the “screw-tapes” sub-section of the ‘discography’ heading. One way of displaying this information could be with a 3 column graph. Another strategy for breaking up this information would be to display the tapes by release date. As noted at the top of the page, check to make sure that all information presented is referenced with a verifiable source. If there is any additional information available about DJ Screw’s “screw-tapes,” you could add a section about the impact of the tapes on his life/work/etc. One last note – are there any external links available to his tapes that could be provided within the page to explore some of the works listed (i.e. under the ‘discography’ heading).

All in all, the depth of information presented in this page is meaningful and relevant to the life of DJ Screw and the page has been constructed in a logical manner. Nice job! HeelFan2445 (talk) 17:16, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review by Beatkins (talk) 10:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Well-written: Very well writen. I thought it looked very professional and had a lot of facts that were backed up by cites.

Comprehensive: it was very easy to follow this page. I liked how at the top you were able to give the quick overview and then went into more detail. It was easy to follow his life through this site.

Well-researched: Very well researched i would try and think about maybe puting a book as a site though

Neutral: well writen didn't seem as if it was writen by a fan or a hater. very factual.

Formatted appropriated: love iT. i like how you went into detail about him wanting to be a truck driver before wanting to be a Dj

Pier review
Well-written- Very well written, takes information and makes it easy to read/follow. Comprehensive- Provides a lot of information about DJ Screw, doesnt seem to leave anything out. Good organization of information and a good selection of subtitles! Well-researched- Does not lack information, however the more sources that provide info the better, even if it is repetitive it could make your page even more legitimate. Provides information in a very neutral way, the format of the page is very organized, keep up the good work. Brechbue (talk) 21:35, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review by Bpellis (talk) 00:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Well-written: I thought that it was very cleaver to make a bibliography for DJ Screw for your Wikipedia entry. It looked very professional and followed the Wikipedia format correctly. There were only a few grammar errors that are easy to fix.

Comprehensive: I think you did a great job with all of the information you gave throughout the page. One of the things I would like to see would be some more early life information, and if anything in his childhood inspired him.

Well-researched: After going through the sources you provided, I thought they were trustworthy. One thing I would add would be more citations.

Neutral: I definitely think your page presents views fairly and without bias.

Formatted appropriated: I believe the Wikipedia page is formatted correctly. I also believe it is well structured. The only thing I would recommend changing would be the citations throughout the page.

Bpellis (talk) 00:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review by Johnstc Johnstc (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Overall great job and a very creative topic. I would not think of something like this to do research on but it is perfect because you can be specific and almost create a bibliography for DJ Screw.

Well Written: I think the bibliography aspect of the Wikipedia entry is very good. One thing I would try to add is more links within your page. It will make it look much more professional as well as create the Wikipedia guidelines. I feel like this page has created a very professional feel and is well written. I noticed a few grammer errors throughout the page, mainly at the bottom in the Death and Legacy sections. I also feel like those sections should be a bit more expanded and deepened with the history of what happened.

Comprehensive: I thought you did a great job illustrating where he was from and the background he was raised in. I think you need to expand in dates and exact places DJ Screw was throughout his life and career. I am a little confused what else he was involved with except for a DJ and a little bit of obstacles. I think it would be smart to expand on his life growing up and learning the ways. Who does he learn from? What exact does he take from each person?

Well- Researched:I feel like the sources used at the bottom of the page are very reliable. Personally, I would like to see a few more links and proof of where you found exact dates and information if I was using this as an educational purpose. I feel like the citing part is a bit weak. I think it would be great to show in detail where the citations were used within the page of your DJ Screw article.

Neutral: There does not seem to be a bias in any direction. My one thought would be that her writter assumes that people are a little educated on this man, and in fact I have no idea who he is. I think you just outlined a great use of information and recorded accurate data.

Formatted Appropriately: This article does follow Wikipedia guidelines. I feel the main change is that links need to be made within the page to other Wikipedia pages. I feel like the writer needs to pay more attention to "screw tapes" and make sure it is fitting into the page and organized the same way as the rest of the information.

I think overall this page is very informative and has a deep value. Good work!! Johnstc (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)Johnstc

Peer Review By Dion Guy User:Trheel57
Overll great job and a very interesting topic.

Strengths: You all had great sources to back your information up. Also this page was well structure and I feel as though the information was well in order. Also I felt that your page was neutral and that this page was not biased in anyway.

weaknesses: I really did not see any weaknesses, but I think you could have talk about some artists that DJ Screw influenced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarheel57 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review
The information is all relevant and should probably be included at some point. Careful about use of past and present tense. He “was” a DJ, but he “is” the creator. Some of the sentences are a little too complex. Try to remove eliminate unnecessary information. I would include the death in the biography, and mention the controversy about it in there. No need to add unnecessary headings. Same things goes for the subheadings under Legacy. I also think that it reads a little too much like a narrative. It’s important to include factual information that is important to understanding his story, but minor details can be omitted. This is highly comprehensive… I was impressed with the extent to which you covered the discography. Coverage of his life, legacy, and his musical contributions are what is needed and what is covered here. The inline citations seem to reference reliable resources. Be careful not to editorialize. “cast a large shadow in Houston.” Things that can’t be measured usually require some kind of value judgment. Just quote somebody who says something like that, instead of stating it flat out. As far as I can see, you’ve provided the necessary citations. The screw tapes are kind of disorganized in a list. I would use a table. Earthtoclay (talk) 02:51, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review By Levi Michael

Well-written: I thought the page was well written other than some grammatical errors. Could use another proof read, but for the most part it was logical and professional.

Comprehensive: The page seemed to be in order and had good progression. It was also well organized.

Well-researched: I feel like the page was well-researched. There was significant information covering the topic to its entirety. Also, good job with the amount and validity of the citation, this makes the page more reliable.

Neutral: The page does not show bias and presents views fairly.

Formatted appropriated: This page had solid presentation and follows Wikipedia style guidelines. Looked similar to many other official Wikipedia pages.

Leviburt (talk) 03:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review by Beatkins (talk) 10:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Well-written: Very well writen. I thought it looked very professional and had a lot of facts that were backed up by cites.

Comprehensive: it was very easy to follow this page. I liked how at the top you were able to give the quick overview and then went into more detail. It was easy to follow his life through this site.

Well-researched: Very well researched i would try and think about maybe puting a book as a site though

Neutral: well writen didn't seem as if it was writen by a fan or a hater. very factual.

Formatted appropriated: love iT. i like how you went into detail about him wanting to be a truck driver before wanting to be a Dj —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brooke.atkinson (talk • contribs) 17:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Mixtapes
An IP just removed the overly-detailed template from the section listing the screw-tapes. Is that section warranted, or should the list of titles be pared back? —C.Fred (talk) 17:23, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The mixtapes should be added in a table under this section. An artist's discography is essential, even when there are a lack of references. Ben0kto (talk) 18:48, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Side note: After a google search, it appears that most of the Screw-tape releases listed aren't actually bootleg tapes, but official Screwed Up Click Records releases. Ben0kto (talk) 19:08, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Additional information in 'Legacy' section
It should be mentioned that the Screwed Up Records and Tapes location at 7717 Cullen Blvd in Houston, TX has been relocated to 3538 West Fuqua, Houston, TX. Also, merchandise/recordings/memorabilia can be purchased online now at http://screweduprecords.com/. This would be beneficial for new fans or those looking to find more current info on SUC and Screw. --Kingha94 (talk) 21:46, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Considerations should also be made to include the following: Although much of today's music is influenced by DJ Screw's contributions, there is one genre that openly acknowlgdes its ties to screwed and chopped music. Witch house (music genre) is a sub-genre of EDM that mixes slowed down beats with skipping.

Here is an article that features interviews from those associated with the witch house band, Salem. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/arts/music/07witch.html Kingha94 (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2016 (UTC)