Talk:Da'i al-Mutlaq

This article on Da'i al-Mutlaq refers to the post of the head of a religious community, so care should be taken to not post individual views which can hurt the religious sentiments of people.

The material in the latter part of the article clearly represents biased views of individuals and sought to malign the image not only of the Dawoodi Bohra community but also their Spiritual Leader.

The language of the article itself so obviously points out that this article is being used for propaganda of views against the said community and its leader.

It should be taken care to not include such derogatory, biased and hence disputable views in an enclyclopedia about any religion or community.

All readers are encouraged to find out themselves about the community and not base their judgement on this article alone. -- 18:00, 22 July 2007 User:Anonmust

Stop the edit war!
The negative views could be included in this article if they were appropriately sourced, and presented as being the views of those who have expressed such views (and not the views Wikipedia itself). However, continually deleting and re-adding the contested section is pointless, and does nothing to improve the article... AnonMoos 11:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

User:TeamAlavi is it necessary to repeat the Dai Mutlaq under the Alavi heading? Since in theory the positions are the same for Dawoodi's and it's already been mentioned above it? I propose to merge the information you have provided in the abbove section, and then differentiate the Alavis from Dawoodis. Muffizainu (talk) 10:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

This is not a War, but healthy Editing
Hello Brother,

Yes suggestions are just and valid. Thank you. I will sure try to incorporate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeamAlavi (talk • contribs) 04:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)