Talk:Daily Ummat

What grounds do we have to consider the Ananova-article referred to in footnote 2 as being more trustworthy than the interview of OBL in the Ummat Daily? Having thought about this for a while, I decided to add the word "allegedly", so that it now says: "the reporter allegedly never actually met Bin Laden, but merely sent written questions to the Taliban government (at that time in power in Afghanistan and facing an attack from the US/UN) and received written replies.[2]" --Mikaelbook (talk) 04:22, 14 September 2011 (UTC)