Talk:Daniel R. Lucey

Review
As I wrote in the DYK review, I found some minor instances of close paraphrasing that could do with attention.

Earwig (before it died on me) found a relatively high %age with ; I don't consider any of the hits here a real problem, but some elegant variation might be worthwhile to break up the blocks it finds in the lead and in "2014 was also the year that he proposed an exhibition on epidemics to the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, where he is a research associate in Anthropology."

By eye, I noticed the following that could do with moving further from the source; I didn't do exhaustive checks, so there might be others.

From Ref 1:

"During the 1980s, he took care of people affected by HIV/AIDS, at a time when the disease was a mystery." (lead) cf

"In the  1980s,  he  took  care  of  patients  in  San  Francisco  who  were  suffering  from  a  mysterious  disease  that  would  become  known  as  AIDS."

"Following the September 11 attacks, Lucey was in Washington DC during the anthrax scare..." (lead) cf

"He was  in  Washington,  D.C.,  when  an  anthrax  scare  closely  followed  the  terrorism  attacks  of  9/11..."

"He was in Washington DC during the anthrax scare, when in the later months of 2001, letters containing anthrax spores were posted to a number of media outlets and two U.S. senators, killing five people and infecting 17 others. Having prepared protocols and arranged stock piles of antibiotics for potential bioterrorism incidents, he helped prepare the hospital for those anthrax attacks." cf

"As chief of the infectious diseases section at Washington Hospital Center in Washington, D.C., he helped  develop  protocols  and  convinced  the  pharmacy  director  to order a lot of antibiotics.  ... But  at  about  the  same  time,  letters  containing anthrax spores were mailed to several  media  outlets.  In  early  October,  contaminated letters were also mailed to two U.S. senators. The attacks killed five people and infected 17 others. Thanks to Lucey, Washington Hospital Center was prepared."

"...injecting the antibiotics directly into the space around the lung." cf

"they injected the antibiotics directly into the space around the lung..."

From Ref 10:

"Lucey noted that the first case of anthrax presented with meningitis" cf "Lucey (2005) notes that meningitis was the presenting symptom in the first diagnosed case of anthrax in the 2001 anthrax event;"

"Prior to 2001, anthrax was rarely encountered and was known as woolsorter disease due to its occurrence in those who worked with wool." [this needs to state inhalational explicitly as cutaneous anthrax is not particularly rare and not known as Woolsorter disease] cf

"Before October 2001, inhalational anthrax was rarely seen but was known as Woolsorter disease because workers in industrial mills were at the highest risk of exposure from the hides, wool, and hair of contaminated animals..."

Out of the scope of the DYK review, I also noted the following, for reference: Hope all this helps in developing the article. Espresso Addict (talk) 08:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Capsule in first sentence is needed (nationality, state explicitly physician or researcher or both)
 * Article is a bit light on dates (can you extract them from his online CV?)
 * Needs minor copy edits in places eg removing unneeded caps for diseases, "a MD", some tense issues
 * Inaccurate quote capitalisation eg "The summer in Africa transformed me..."
 * Awards -- suggest mentioning the IDSA & ACP fellowships as these contribute to notability
 * I'd suggest removing the names of non-notable children
 * The favourite quote feels like trivia
 * 100 research papers and book chapters could be removed -- actually quite low published research papers (90) and book chapters don't usually count
 * Selected publications does not conform to the usual -- book chapters are usually excluded, only max ~5 research articles which should generally be the highest cited, which usually does not include a book review. The full citation details are missing.