Talk:Dee Mosbacher

Conflict of interest issue
This article is very poorly written. Very promotional. The history shows several SPAs who heavily edited this page and almost nothing else (except for the page of subject's partner - Nanette Gartrell). Despite being advised on their talk pages about COI, they have continued to edit (rather aggressively and enthusiastically but only on these accounts), and specifically, remove the COI tags. I have reinstated them for now. I consider any removal of tags without valid rationale, as agreed on the talk page by consensus, to be further breaches of 3RR, COI & PROMO and grounds for requesting page protection to curb their interference. History

Rayman60 (talk) 18:29, 28 July 2017 (UTC)


 * , I see nothing in this article that justifies the tags or the accusations on the editors above, and bearing in mind WP:BRD, and WP:3R, nothing that authorises you to insist on a discussion about their removal. Please comment. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:58, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * As I said at Talk:Nanette Gartrell, I don't think there's cause to add tags and imply wrongdoing on the subject's part. There isn't a protracted dispute, and the edits were mostly to update references or fix the writing. SarahSV (talk) 05:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)