Talk:Nanette Gartrell

Neutrality?
It appears that this entry was written by Ms Gartell or a fan. Using words like "groundbreaking" is an indicator. These normally would not appear in a neutral article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.200.183 (talk) 05:27, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of interest issue
This article is very poorly written. Very promotional. The history shows several SPAs who heavily edited this page and almost nothing else (except for the page of subject's partner - Dee Mosbacher). Despite being advised on their talk pages about COI, they have continued to edit (rather aggressively and enthusiastically but only on these accounts), and specifically, remove the COI tags. I have reinstated them for now. I consider any removal of tags without valid rationale, as agreed on the talk page by consensus, to be further breaches of 3RR, COI & PROMO and grounds for requesting page protection to curb their interference. History Rayman60 (talk) 18:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * (this editor has only been active on the Mosbacher article. All others have been SPA/COI over both accounts)
 * (this editor has only been active on the Mosbacher article. All others have been SPA/COI over both accounts)
 * (this editor has only been active on the Mosbacher article. All others have been SPA/COI over both accounts)
 * (this editor has only been active on the Mosbacher article. All others have been SPA/COI over both accounts)


 * , I see nothing in this article that justifies the tags or the accusations on the editors above, and bearing in mind WP:BRD, and WP:3R, nothing that authorises you to insist on a discussion about their removal. Please comment. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:00, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I would support removing the tag, because it implies wrongdoing on the part of the subject, and there have been very few disputed edits. SarahSV (talk) 05:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)