Talk:Dial-a-Phone

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 January 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Someone keeps adding negative info about Dialaphone, which is completely untrue. Either they are competitors, or customers confusing Dialaphone with Dialamobile, which went bust recently. The two company are not connected.

Well, I'm a customer and I had a really bad experience with them... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Voodoochilli (talk • contribs) 11:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have expanded this. References aren't the best, but they're the best I could find. Kyle.jack (talk) 14:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

COI and cleanup[edit]

As per Talk:Phones4U, the single issue editor editor Kyle.jack has disclosed a WP:COI. Please see WP:EXT for appropriate links. I have tagged the article with these issues. Widefox (talk) 13:22, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]