Talk:Direct voice input

Opening heading
Do we really need a seperate article for voice recognition in aircraft? This could be merged with Voice User Interface or Speech Recognition. Just because the army coined a seperate term for it doesn't mean it deserves a whole new article. --80.63.213.182 (talk) 20:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Think it was probably more the Air Force not the Army, but yes tend to agree. Could be moved to within Voice User Interface. But then maybe Voice User Interface and Speech Recognition also need to be rationalised / combined. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Confusing
I found this article rather difficult to understand

Yeah dude, PowerUserPCDude was here (yeah) (talk) 00:07, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Direct Voice Input → Direct voice input –

Generic process. Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony  (talk)  04:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Support - sounds fair enough to me. I agree that this term looks generic. —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 20:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support - also sounds fair to me. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.