Talk:Distributed Concurrent Versions System

Untitled
I redirected DCVS to Concurrent Versions System. A Google for CVS version control gets 8.2 million hits, DCVS version control less than 800. By strong consensus WP:ISNOT a directory; however, if you can provide information demonstrating a substantial user base or widespread media coverage I am confident that a separate article can be justified. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 09:31, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

I restored the redirect. It is the nature of open-source software that multiple versions become available. What is different about this one? - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 13:12, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * DCVS must by nature be very new, while CVS is seriously entrenched. (Subversion for instance is superior, but is only displacing cvs slowly). This explains the google discrepency you saw. DCVS is sufficiently unique that it certainly warrents its own article. Note also that CVS is itself an evolution from RCS, in case you wish to pursue an argument along that line. Kim Bruning 17:15, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The one thing that is certainly true is that DCVS is not CVS, so a redirect seems inappropriate here. Kim Bruning 17:16, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Mediator's response at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/09_12_2005_Distributed_Current_Versions_System
 * Steven McCrary 17:33, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Distributed Concurrent Versions System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120722125922/http://www.elegosoft.com/en/solutions/distributed-cvs/why-dcvs.html to http://www.elegosoft.com/en/solutions/distributed-cvs/why-dcvs.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)