Talk:Districts of Kyrgyzstan

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Raions of Kyrgyzstan → Districts of Kyrgyzstan – All the individual articles use the term "district". Same for the category. Use English, avoid jargon. Relisted. BDD (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC) relisting see below Andrewa (talk) 14:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Aleksandr Krymsky (talk) 19:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: Raion is a perfectly acceptable word in English, and is not considered jargon.  There may be a case for this move on the grounds of Common name, but the proposer's inference is, quite simply, false.  Skinsmoke (talk) 16:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, I guess because "raion" is not a word. But we use words like "arrondisment" freelu in English... I suppose I support because policy supports it but I'm a little torn. Red Slash 22:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Support per WP:COMMONNAME. Districts seems to be more common English term then raions .--Staberinde (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak support, weak only because but I think a still better title for this article would be List of districts of Kyrgyzstan. Relisting to see what others think of this. Andrewa (talk) 14:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: It used to be the case that all list pages had to be titled List of...  That hasn't been the case for about two years, and it is now perfectly acceptable to title the page either Raions of Kyrgyzstan or Districts of Kyrgyzstan under the new guidance.  Leaving out the List of... may well encourage someone to develop this into a bit more detail, giving some historical background, and a reasonable summary of the key statistics, on the lines of Civil parishes in Cornwall.  Skinsmoke (talk) 14:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: Can you give links or diffs to these policy or guideline pages or changes? But in any case it seems to me that in this case we should go one way or the other... either the scope of this article is just the list and it should named as such, or it's a stub of a larger article containing these lists and should be tagged with a stub template. I still tend to the list for now, to match the current scope, as I'm concerned that the more general article will be too large, but the addition of a couple of sections showing the material you want added and marked with could change that. But if there's a lot of material to add, suggest consider moving to the list name and creating a stub at Districts of Kyrgyzstan for the other material. No change of vote for now. Andrewa (talk) 00:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: As usual, you can never find the bloody thing when you need it.  The matter came up under a Featured list review, when it was pointed out that the guidelines had changed, and now appears to be lost in the archives somewhere.  The only thing I can find right now is Manual of Style/Stand-alone lists, which states:


 * Skinsmoke (talk) 04:04, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: Found the specific section at Manual of Style/Stand-alone lists, in the final paragraph of that section:


 * Skinsmoke (talk) 04:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: To be honest, there is no reason why the addition of material would make this particular page too large (it isn't exactly overlarge as it stands).  Any list article is supposed to have an introduction anyway, and the addition of a section, say, about the history of the district level in the country (when districts/raions were introduced), and what functions they serve, along with a paragraph summarising the largest, smallest, most populous, least populous, newest etc. would still leave the article well within the limits.  This is exactly the sort of article the guidelines are referring to when they talk about Set index articles.  Skinsmoke (talk) 04:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisting comment This is a technical relist only; Andrewa's relist on 24 February didn't go through, for whatever reason. This discussion can be closed from 3 March on. --BDD (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Districts of Kyrgyzstan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090802180521/http://enrin.grida.no/htmls/kyrghiz/soe2/english/map/map3.htm to http://enrin.grida.no/htmls/kyrghiz/soe2/english/map/map3.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721201655/http://e-bishkek.kg/?q=node/13 to http://e-bishkek.kg/?q=node/13
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090817192542/http://e-bishkek.kg:80/?q=menutree/menu-rayon-adm to http://e-bishkek.kg/?q=menutree/menu-rayon-adm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070824165011/http://www.chuy.in.kg:80/html/rus/rai.htm to http://chuy.in.kg/html/rus/rai.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)