Talk:Dog's Eye View

Fair use rationale for Image:Dog's eye view happy nowhere.jpg
Image:Dog's eye view happy nowhere.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dog's eye view happy nowhere.jpg
Image:Dog's eye view happy nowhere.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dog's eye view happy nowhere.jpg
Image:Dog's eye view happy nowhere.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed merge from Peter Stuart
I have tagged the article Peter Stuart for merger into this article. His solo career does not meet WP:BAND's requirement, and he has not been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician.

The article Peter Stuart contains material on him which is not present in the article on the band, sand a WP:MERGE will allow some of that to be preserved. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:32, 24 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Is this merger going to happen, or has it been dropped? The Peter Stuart article was nominated for DYK, but naturally has been put on hold since DYK doesn't want to highlight an article that could disappear at any minute. If the merger is off, then I don't see any reason why the DYK nomination should not proceed; if it's inevitable (and before the end of the year), then the nomination should be called off. Thanks for any information you can supply. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Disagree The article as it stands has a number of independent sources that establish notability.  Most of the information in the Stuart article is irrelevant to the band article.  Much of this has been added since the merge proposal.  Aymatth2 (talk) 13:29, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Release date of Tomorrow Always Comes
Some sources say that the Tomorrow Always Comes album was released in 2005, while others say 2006. I am not sure which is correct or how to find out for sure, so I have removed the release date from the text. SunCrow (talk) 21:34, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I have also added a "disputed" tag to the release date indicated in the discography. SunCrow (talk) 21:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)