Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternative music

{| width=100% style="background:none;"
 * colspan=2 style="border:1px solid #bfd7ff; background-color:#f5f9ff; padding:10px;"|
 * valign=top style="border:1px solid #bfd7ff; background-color:#f5f9ff; padding:10px; width:100%"|
 * valign=top style="border:1px solid #bfd7ff; background-color:#f5f9ff; padding:10px;"|
 * valign=top style="border:1px solid #bfd7ff; background-color:#f5f9ff; padding:10px;"|

{| width=100% style="background:none;" To start a new discussion section, please [ click here]
 * colspan=2 style="border:1px solid #bfd7ff; background-color:#f5f9ff; padding:10px;"|
 * colspan=2 style="border:1px solid #bfd7ff; background-color:#f5f9ff; padding:10px;"|
 * style="border:3px solid #bfd7ff; background-color:#e1edff; padding:0.2em; font-size:120%; text-align:center;"|

User script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like and turns it into something like
 * John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
 * John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from cite web, cite journal and doi.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

FAR for Monkey Gone to Heaven
I have nominated Monkey Gone to Heaven for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 03:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Jimmy Chamberlin
Jimmy Chamberlin has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Bigbang (Norwegian band)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Bigbang (Norwegian band) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 2pou (talk) 21:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Henry Rollins
Henry Rollins has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Feedback on draft for "505"
I submitted a draft for "505" by Arctic Monkeys, but reviewers haven't gotten around to it (probably due to the 3,271 other pending submissions). The song (I think) has a pretty alternative sound, and the rock music WikiProject is kind of inactive. The draft template says to go to one of these, so if any reviewers want to view the draft, here is the link.

Sincerely, Dontuseurrealname (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * }

FAR for Music of Athens, Georgia
I have nominated Music of Athens, Georgia for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

(A rather old) PR for Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)
Hi all! A couple months ago, I submitted the above article for a peer review with the hopes of getting it featured. The link is at Peer review/Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)/archive1; if anyone is interested, I would love any feedback I can get on how to improve the article to where it is the best it can be :) Dylan 620  (he/him • talk • edits) 20:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:When the Pawn...
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:When the Pawn... that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. EggRoll97 (talk) 22:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Who Killed...... The Zutons?
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Who Killed...... The Zutons? that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 20:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Nationality discussion at Talk:Snow Patrol
There is a discussion currently ongoing at Talk:Snow Patrol regarding a controversial change in the band's nationality, which may be of interest to project members. The discussion is titled Change Snow Patrol from Scottish Rock Band to Northern Irish Rock Band. Thanks. HorrorLover555 (talk) 16:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Royals (Lorde song)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Royals (Lorde song) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 12:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for TISM
TISM has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)