Talk:Donghae Expressway

merge
Busan–Ulsan Expressway should merge from here. Busan-Ulsan Expressway and Donghae Expressway in Korean Wikipedia merged too. Look ko:토론:부산울산고속도로.--ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 07:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi . It looks like a merger would make sense, though I don't speak enough Korean to know whether they are indeed the same thing, but looking at a translation of the merger discussion, it seems like the proposal is a bit contentious? Maybe we should wait to see the outcome of the merger discussion on the Korean Wikipedia and examine the arguments on both sides. What do you think? Ry's the Guy  (talk&#124;contribs) 09:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * In South Korea's presidential decree, that two expressway is one.--ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 12:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Jungang Expressway has same problem too.--ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 12:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * No objection from me. Ry's the Guy  (talk&#124;contribs) 15:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Pinging who added a merge template to the Busan–Ulsan Expressway article some time ago and then removed it shortly after. What is your opinion, 김지성1?  Ry's the Guy  (talk&#124;contribs) 15:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Opposed Because ko:부산울산고속도로 (기업)(Busan–Ulsan Expressway (Company)) is not merged to ko:동해고속도로(Donghae Expressway)--ツバル (talk) 23:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Busan–Ulsan Expressway is not about company. In Template:South Korean expressways, There are written that Expressway No.65 is Busan–Ulsan Expressway and Donghae Expressway. And that two expressways have Template:Infobox road. Donghae Expressway is looked like already merged. --ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 08:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Don't you have any more dissent? --ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 05:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for my long absence. I agree to remove Busan–Ulsan Expressway from Template:South Korean expressways. I think that Busan–Ulsan Expressway should be included in the company template like ko:template:대한민국의_고속도로_기업(ROK Expressway Companies).ツバル (talk) 14:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)