Talk:Duluth Eskimos

Well, other then the picture might be 82 years old, who knows... wait, 82 years old, fair use. you can use it for a team jersey inna bad porno if you want now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.153.122.177 (talk) 05:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Duluth Kelleys/Eskimos. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.footballresearch.com/articles/frpage.cfm?topic=franchtrans

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 1 May 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  SITH   (talk)   11:04, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Duluth Kelleys/Eskimos → Duluth Eskimos – The target page is just a redirect, hence this is a request for move over redirect. Following the conventions at WP:NCST, since the name of the team is the Eskimos, the mentioned redirect page should become the primary article page. TheSameGuy (talk) 21:29, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Support move. They played only two years as the Eskimos compared to three as the Kelleys, but it certainly appears as if Eskimos is the common name for the organization as a whole. However, this may be the result of the trademark registration being in the news recently, so we may need to re-evaluate this after a few years.  ONR  (talk)  23:13, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.