Talk:Eberhard Jäckel

Untitled
I note that this article has no reference to Jäckel's role in the authentication of the 1983 forgery of the Hitler Diaries. I'd add something myself if I didn't have papers due this week ... I'll come back and add something later if no one else gets to it first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmooney78 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

POV or unsigned vandalism or plain propaganda
"in disregard of the fact Turkish troops were transgressing the border and exterminating Armenians outside the Ottoman Empire in 1918 (young-Turkish campaign in Caucasus killing 400'00 Armenians) and in 1920 (Kemalist troops killing 60'000 civilians) " I removed this part because there is no indication that Boris Barth's is a response to Eberhardt. Therefore it makes it look like POV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.87.244.6 (talk) 13:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * @195.87.244.6 / IP from Stambul What about signing AND discussing your changes? I reverted your last change and am expecting some discussion. Even Mango - Atatürk admiror and historian in highest Turkish respects speaks of kemalist invasion into ArmeniaApocolocynthosis (talk) 15:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC).

What is there to discuss? Is wikipedia nothing but a propaganda tool to your so called genocide? What has Boris Borth's view have anything to do on an article about Eberhardt? Isnt that some sort of POV. Very cheap attempt at teasing me by vandalising "Istanbul" by the way! I have no intention to get involved in a pointless disscusion about what has happened and what has not. Signed in or not it wont make any differnce to you since I still will be anonymous to you! You may keep the article in any way you want...

Assessment comment
Substituted at 14:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eberhard Jäckel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070613163418/http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/hing/mitarbeiter/jaeckel-en.htm to http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/hing/mitarbeiter/jaeckel-en.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:39, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Introduction
The introduction does not seem to be very well-written. Is it necessary to mention his political affiliation in the first paragraph? Also, his Chernobyl-Hitler allusion need not come in the intro - nearly everyone agrees with it and it is a bit lame to mention as a prominent fact. HalfdanRagnarsson (talk) 08:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Hitler Diaries
There is no mention of the role Jäckel played concerning the Hitler Diaries. --Stephanie Do (talk) 15:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)