Talk:Elgin James

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gang member[edit]

I have now reverted two IP editors adding the category 'gang member' to this article. I do not think this is appropriate as not only is he no longer a member, the original FSU has been disbanded. I will continue to remove the addition of that category until someone explains why they think it should be here and a consensus is reached. Freikorp (talk) 00:17, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MDC[edit]

Removed the speculation that James was placed in an MDC because he was a gang member and/or considered extremely dangerous/escape-prone. It's just as likely that he was put in seg because he's a well-known anti-white power activist, and so he was placed there to be safe from Aryan Brotherhood reprisals. That's speculation too. Neither belong in the article without a reputable source, so I edited it to simply say he served his sentence at an MDC. If someone can find a good source as to exactly why he served his sentence there, it would be a welcome addition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.109.175.105 (talk) 16:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Elgin James/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Article needs a lot of work, will probably be deleted.

For example, "While part of FSU he used a tactic learned from the United States Government [6], with he and other FSU members setting up an "arms for hostages" scenario in which they traded handguns to inner city gang members in exchange for pit bulls used in dog fighting rings. The dogs would then be nursed back to health and fostered until safe homes were found for them."

Cannot locate cited source, cite is in the wrong place (or the "arms for hostages" is an unsubstantiated claim).

Friends Stand United should be on a separate page for obvious reasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stimulus response (talkcontribs) 07:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, bias is present. If the commonly accepted classification of Elgin's "organization" is as a criminal gang, then that should be presented primarily instead of an addendum.

Last edited at 07:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 14:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elgin James. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elgin James. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]