Talk:Emil Brunner

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Question
What does "what he considered a second dissertation" mean? Is what is meant here the normal Habilitationsschrift (in which case it IS a second dissertation) which this theologian would have written in order to take a post like any other German theologian? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.152.88.157 (talk) 21:03, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, according to the German Biographisch-bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon it's his "Habilschrift". So I think I'll amend the article accordingly (by the way it was not I who wrote the original).Apodeictic (talk) 16:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Accuracy of dates
I was looking at the German Biographisch-bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon (a fairly reputable source) and the dates there don't exactly match the dates here. Since it's a fairly reputable source and the information here is unsourced I think I'll amend this article to be in line with the dates in the BBKL entry.Apodeictic (talk) 16:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://theologytoday.ptsem.edu/jan1963/v19-4-article7.htm (added here). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)