Talk:Emil Wolfgang Menzel Jr.

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the source was released under CC Atribution 2.5 --Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 19:48, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Where is this stated in this article, and where is the attribution? Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:52, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The source, my friend, the source. Jan Arkesteijn (talk)

As reviewing administrator, PLoS uses a compatible license with Wikipedia, and the material is acceptable. We have a template for the purpose, and it should have been used; I placed it with the proper parameter-- see Template:OA-attribution. However, as is frequently the case, the manner of writing is not ideal.We do not make judgements of value. It would be best to rewrite in such a way that they can be quoted and attributed to the author of the article in PLOS. Additionally, good practice is that if not all the text is taken from PLoS, the exact extent of the material is attributed. This is most easily done by rewriting.  DGG ( talk ) 22:42, 7 October 2012 (UTC)