Talk:Emily Grossman

This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedily deleted because... This woman is a well-known scientist in the UK and I literally just created the article without being given enough time to add any documentation, and it was one listed in the Women in science editathon as needing creation. It appears the nominator has been too quick on the draw in deleting a number of articles. --LovelyLillith (talk) 10:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you LovelyLillith (talk) for contributing to Wikipedia.
 * The article is literally a two sentence article so it does it take long to read it. Also, sandbox would be the perfect place to work on articles that need documentations.
 * Please let me know if I can help in any way.  MarkYabloko '''  11:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It was two sentences because I had all of 11 minutes to work on it from creation! Please do not speedily delete articles in progress; for those who build in one swoop as I do, as well as new editors who have no knowledge of the sandbox, it is very disruptive. LovelyLillith (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I am glad to see your article coming around nicely! Keep the good work!  MarkYabloko '''  18:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

It is written "she is, of course, Jewish"....surely I'm not the only person to find that an odd sentence! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.92.69.186 (talk) 06:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Added new sections
Hi, I've added a couple of sections to this article and agree with you it shouldn't be deleted. And if you'd be so kind to 3O review Draft:Sorcha Faal and Draft talk:Sorcha Faal it would be greatly appreciated.Picomtn (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Her nationality
Should it be specified?--Adûnâi (talk) 14:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Neutrality dispute
Under the 'Tim Hunt Controversy' section - "she complained about sexist remarks on Twitter and YouTube which were in fact just criticisms after she clearly lost the debate." According to whom did she "clearly" lose the debate? And how can we verify that they weren't racist or sexist? Also, "just criticisms" is not neutral or scholarly in tone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.49.10.184 (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The page was vandalized and has been fixed - thank you for bringing our attention to it. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)