Talk:Emotion classification

Incorporate pictures
Hello! I have completed a Peer Review Letter for my classmates in Cognitive Psychology at UVU. Here are my thoughts: This article did a great job of following the lead's outline. It was easy to follow along with as a reader and understand the two different viewpoints in the lead paragraph. I would suggest that the author(s) try to incorporate pictures to try and explain the different models of emotions that were written in the article. I think it would be helpful to see the different models being portrayed via picture (i.e. Ekman's basic emotions). Although the lead was very brief, I do think it covered all of the information. The author(s) could try to "beef" it up, however, if it was left alone I think it would get the job done. I like how the article was very organized. An article I am working on (Motivated Reasoning) needs help in the organization department. MarciWilson (talk) 02:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Unscientific content
"Emotional equations" by Chip Conley is based on his own observations and not scientific research. I will remove the section by the end of 2020 if no one proves me wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DominykasMrk (talk • contribs) 15:32, 8 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Deleted as of 09.01.2021 — Preceding unsigned comment added by DominykasMrk (talk • contribs) 17:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: MarciWilson, Ulenui760.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Human Cognition SP23
— Assignment last updated by Annann789 (talk) 20:14, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Conflation with theories of the construction or evolution of emotions
I am concerned that this article, opening as it does with a section on theories of the origin/construction of emotions, conflates a discussion of their origin with one about their classification. In the last 20 years, a great deal of work has gone into the application of emotional studies. There have been two Nobel prizes in behavioural economics, there's a strong research group at the Queen Mary Centre for the History of Emotions ([Https://projects.history.qmul.ac.uk/emotions/ https://projects.history.qmul.ac.uk/emotions/]) and another at the University of Geneva-based Swiss Centre for Affective Studies ([Https://www.unige.ch/cisa/ https://www.unige.ch/cisa/]). Much of this work revolves around classification rather than construction. My fear is that someone reading this article will be misled into an exploration of construction/origin when they have visited a page that should more appropriately lead them to these application studies. Ursus-deningeri2 (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)