Talk:Ethanol fuel in Brazil/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * Starting GA review.Pyrotec (talk) 16:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

GA review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

This is quite a long article, so my review took some time do. This is an outstanding GA; my only comment is that you are possibly a bit over enthusiastic about linking, aldehyde for example only "needs" (it may not need any) a maximum of one link in a section, not one link per subsection. Note: aldehyde is a poor example, "hydrated" was far worse, but its the last one I changed.

I suggest that you consider WP:FAC next.

I'm awarding GA-class, it is richly deserved.Pyrotec (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)