Talk:F-box protein

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Js524416.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Merger
As the F-box motif is only found in f-box proteins and the page has no information that isn't on this page, i think it would be sensible to make this the only f-box page. Abergabe (talk) 16:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC) Content part: Actually, I think the material in this article doesn't organized well. The first paragraph talks about the F-box protein and the function of F-box protein. In the second paragraph, it talks about F-box domain and its potential interaction motifs. I think this arrangement is not well. The article cover the topic partially, it just point out some related knowledge, but doesn't talks in much detail. The evidence quality is good, it use the primary article to give evidence. It use the reference to tell the fact not assumptions. The content could improve from these aspects: (1) There is one place needed to add citation in the first paragraph end. (2) We can add more content on the F-box protein function in plant, like hormone signaling, stress response. (3) We can add one example of F-box protein structure. In this article, it provide a                                               structure of SKP1-SKP2 complex, it is not appropriate. Quality: This article have an introduction, this introduction is understandable and it does summarize the article's key points.However, this introduction doesn't provide much details and organize well. This article doesn't provide several headings and subheadings. There is indeed something missing, obviously, there is one citation missing. The image which names as F-box domain, the place is correct, but the image is not correct, it doesn't provide a clearly picture of F-box domain structure. The overall coverage is neutral and the facts are emphazied. The references are not much reliable sources, because some from primary paper, some are not. Js524416 (talk) 14:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Writing class critique by Jingwen Song