Talk:Five Point Someone

Untitled
Have removed some paragraphs. Direct copy from this article. - Ambuj 17:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)


 * have completed the merger. - Aksi great 06:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Threeidiots.jpg
The image Image:Threeidiots.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --13:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

NPOV
"The novel is vulgar at times....like the section where Neha and Hari went to see the movie and they were shown a documentary on Family Planning.Also they get physical with each other. Come on man who would dare to have sex with the professor's daughter? Also the Fuck word is used many a times which is vulgar and unethical at times. I would say the book is Romantically science or Scientifically Romance. But the best part is that it is scientifically vulgar!"

This looks like somebody giving their personal opinions- hardly right for an enclyopedia.

I second that. I'm removing this paragraph for now. --Aksnitd (talk) 06:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Sequel?
Where are the references that say 2 States is a sequel of this book? Is there any other proof that this is true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.91.201.56 (talk) 10:00, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Removed the second paragraph and renamed the section. Rajeshja (talk) 11:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Inadequate source
Reference 7:^ A book, a film and the truth is not adequate because it reflects personal opinion (the author's point of view - who is involved). --Excaliboor (talk) 22:12, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved to Five Point Someone. Favonian (talk) 15:59, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Five Point Someone – What not to do at IIT! → Five Point Someone – Taglines should not be present in the titles. The name of the book is "five point someone", and the rest of it is just a caption. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 04:27, 10 June 2012 (UTC)  Secret of success (talk)  08:16, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Support WP:COMMONNAME and official -- Redtigerxyz  Talk 06:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Other than the problems with this entry that are already mentioned, the language is faulty and grammatically incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.166.85 (talk) 14:01, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Five Point Someone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130217224552/http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/interviews/2009/chetan-bhagat-interview-261209.html to http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/interviews/2009/chetan-bhagat-interview-261209.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100225125702/http://www.hindustantimes.com/Chetan-Bhagat-feeling-cheated/H1-Article1-491135.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Chetan-Bhagat-feeling-cheated/H1-Article1-491135.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

how about a table
In the paragraphs about the characters, the complex parentheses are a bit hard to read. I propose to move them to a table at either the bottom or the top of that section, thus: