Talk:Flame & Citron

English title is Flame & Citron
Several sources exist for this - a notable one would be the ny times review: http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/07/31/movies/31flame.html. Please don't move this article again, or change the English title, without proper discussion. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 23:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for documenting this, as I was about to make a move. A weird translation, but it appears as the English title really is Flame & Citron. Citron is not the same as a lemon, in English, but it is the official English title nevertheless.


 * RhinoMind (talk) 17:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

GOCE Copy-edit of October 27, 2015
In response to a request for a copy-edit of Flame & Citron at Wikipedia, I have just completed a copy-edit of the article. After I finished, I realized that "Citronen" was probably the Danish name, and it is paired with "Flammen". in this edit I changed "Citronen" to "Citron". I guess if "Flammen" is used, then "Citronen" should be used. Before changing it back, however, I'd like to point out that, unless the Danish version is in a quote (or the translation at the very beginning of the article), I think the English words "Flame and Citron" or "Flame & Citron" should be used throughout the article. I'm too tired to check now, but perhaps in the place where I changed "Citronen" to "Citron", "Flammen" should also be changed to "Flame".

I plan on reading the article once through again tomorrow to see if there is anything I missed. Corinne (talk) 02:22, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . I intend to use their original names (instead of their modified names for English audience) because they're historical figures so I kept "Flammen" and "Citronen". They are referred as such in all English Wikipedia pages (yeah, I know Wikipedia is not a reliable source). What are your thoughts? Are there any appropriate guidelines? Thanks, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 02:39, 22 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, I'm not well-versed in this aspect of editing, but I did see a discussion that seems relevant. You'll see the exchanges regarding Google searches. I think it would be a good idea to do a Google search of the two sets of names. You'd be looking for sources in English, academic ones especially, and not Wikipedia articles. See the discussion at Talk:Johannes Scotus Eriugena. I don't know how to search specifically for academic sources in English, though. Perhaps you could ask one of those editors involved in that discussion. Corinne (talk) 02:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC) P.S. I suppose it would be academic sources and other reliable sources. Corinne (talk) 03:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That's kind of difficult; becasue both "flame" and "citron" are common words in English and because of the film itself, the results are not so precise. The searches (using the searching link given by JFH in the mentioned discussion) are far more for "Flame" "Citron" than for "Flammen" "Citronen" (though as I said, only in the first page, four results out of ten are not related to them). Gabriel Yuji (talk) 23:14, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Gabriel Yuji I clicked on the first link you supplied just above, and when I looked in the upper right-hand corner, I saw a little yellow-orange box. In that box, it said, "Looking for results in English?" and then "Change to English" and "Manter em portugues" (stay in Portuguese). When I clicked on "Change to English", I saw more than 9,000 results. When I clicked on the second of the links you provided, I didn't see that yellow-orange box or even a count of results, so I don't know. Shouldn't we be looking for results in English? Corinne (talk) 03:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC) Corinne (talk) 03:29, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, we should look for English sources. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 16:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Flame & Citron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.seminci.es/noticia.php?id=488
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120518064843/http://www.ffa.de/downloads/publikationen/GB_FFA_2009.pdf to http://www.ffa.de/downloads/publikationen/GB_FFA_2009.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ffa.de/downloads/dfff/foerderzusagen/Foerderzusagen_DFFF_2007.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ifcfilms.com/films/flame-citron
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ifcfilms.com/dvd-digital-download
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bodilprisen.dk/2009
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://nyhederne.tv2.dk/article.php/id-20165730%3A%C3%A5rets-robertvindere.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.arbejderen.dk/index.aspx?F_ID=47474&TS_ID=3&S_ID=41&C_ID=147

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)