User talk:Lilac Soul

Orphaned non-free image (File:Logo psykiatri 15mm.jpg)
You've uploaded File:Logo psykiatri 15mm.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 22:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

my ronnie edit
its true ffs. why would i risk the reputation of that website? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.241.156 (talk) 20:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * If it's true, you should have no problems adding a reliable source. Otherwise, it is just WP:OR, which is not allowed on Wikipedia, and is particularly problematic in the case of living persons. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) • I'm watching this page so just reply to me right here! 20:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
My apologies. I meant to revert the additions to Ronaldinho which you had been carefuly removing and instead I managed to remove your fixes and warn you for vandalism. Sorry about that, mea culpa. srushe (talk) 21:54, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it, I've done the same myself in the past, and probably will do so accidentally again :-) - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 12:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

St. Peter's
Thanks for your edits! Can I suggest that in many places where you are adding a full name to link a person who is only identified in the text by their surname (or whatever) that you simplify matters by simply replacing the name that already there, instead of politely separating your edit from the text. I just did this with your edits to Jacopo Sansovino (who was previously only identified in the text as Sansovino, and Antonio da Sangallo the Younger. In both cases your edits make the matter clearer. Amandajm (talk) 06:05, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Very good point, that certainly makes it easier for the reader. Thanks for the suggestion! - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 17:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Potosi
I don't know if I just lost your edits in saving my text changes. I'll get out of the way and go and make dinner, while you check! cheers! Amandajm (talk) 07:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I think my edits are intact. Besides, they were only disambiguation fixes - as nice as those are, in my opinion, they are nowhere near as important as they types of fixes you made. So don't worry about it! - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 08:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Hej!
Jeg kan se at du er aktiv på den engelske Wikipedia, og at du er fra Danmark. I skrivende stund, diskuterer vi på landsbybrønden et nyt forslag, om at starte en national afdeling, der vil blive kaldet Wikimedia Danmark. Hvis du er interesseret i at bidrage med noget tid til at få startet afdelingen, kan du skrive dit navn på denne side hos meta. Tak for din tid! Mike H. Fierce! 08:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Tak for invitationen. Det lader til, at meningen er, at da.wikipedia skal blive bedre funderet? Jeg må tilstå, at jeg kun har personligt overskud til at arbejde på en.wikipedia. Jeg synes pt. ikke den danske Wikipedia er af særlig høj standard, og det vil efter min mening være for stor en opgave for mig at deltage i at få højnet kvaliteten mærkbart. Men jeg ønsker jer held og lykke med det, og hvis det lykkes for jer at få kvaliteten op, så er det da meget muligt at jeg vil bidrage mere aktivt på den danske afdeling også. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 12:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Euro referendum
I've got a few questions: The referendum will be held next year, and will only try to introduce the euro, ignoring the two-and-a-half other opt-outs? What is still required before the vote will officially be fixed for next year? The support of the Socialist People's Party? Will they adopt a more pro-European party line (since they are being considered for inclusion in the European Green Party, and only their EU position remains an obstacle, that might have side benefits)? Thanks! — Nightstallion 16:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the article does lack some info on what it is the socialist people's party wants. I'll try and find a good reference either today or tomorrow. The news I've heard was about the Euro, but they haven't said whether they plan to hold the Euro referendum alone or in combination with others.- Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 18:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Line of succession to the Danish throne
Hi! I added the unborn child of Joachim and Marie because I presume it takes place in the line of succession. For example, should the first six persons in the line die suddenly, the crown wouldn't pass to Benedikte. Instead, the unborn child would become monarch at the moment of birth. That situation arose in Spain, when the king died leaving three daughters and a pregnant wife. Unfortunatly for the eldest daughter, her mother gave birth to a son. Marie's baby baby will take place after his/her older brothers, regardless of the sex. I do not insist on including it though, I just thought it would be interesting to add the information. Perhaps we can just say that the baby will be 7th in the line of succession regardless of gender. What do you think? Surtsicna (talk) 17:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * AFAIK, there is no official standpoint on this. However, all lines of succession I've seen printed in the Danish media do not include the unborn child, so I think we shouldn't include it either - doing so would probably be WP:OR. How about a note to the line of succession stating that, "the unborn child of XXX will be placed after YYY and before ZZZ"? I think I would be fine with that, as that would be neutral and not OR. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 17:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed, adding the unborn baby could be regarded as original research. The article should certainly include the information about the future changes in the line. Surtsicna (talk) 17:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Silence of Dean Maitland
Re : thanks, I agree. I think there's enough background to merit its own article (it appears to have been a highly notable and taboo-busting novel in its time). Gordonofcartoon (talk) 00:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Personally, however, I don't know anything by neither the author nor the novel. You appear to have some knowledge on the subject, having started the author's article. Do you know enough to start the article on the novel, as well? - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 06:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nearly: I need to have a look at a broader range of contemporary reviews first, as they weren't all glowing (e.g. the Pall Mall Gazette called it "powerful but unpleasant"). Gordonofcartoon (talk) 12:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Kosovan passport
The problem is that the other user wont read and learn the difference between de facto and de jure. That is the remaining problem which I hope we will solve soon. The other problem is that he removed maintenance templates for which I warned him and told him it is not allowed so he stopped doing it. But it would be too time consuming to run RfC - in what state would that article be in the meantime? Anyway it's sad but you know it probably that some users wont bother with discussing an issue unless you revert their edits, only then they notice that there is a problem.--Avala (talk) 20:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Did You Know problems
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Art LaPella (talk) 02:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the headup, I've responded at the DYK nomination entry. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 06:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

thanks for your help
The article is looking alot better. Cheers. I'm now having fun creating a new stub on the IEPA (with Merete Nordentoft as the vice president) - but ended up with a copying warning after simply coping the association aims onto the article Earlypsychosis (talk) 12:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, too. These may not be highly visible pages, but I think they're fairly important. Merete Nordentoft is my boss, incidentally. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 12:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll let you (and others) play around with the article a bit. As for the copyright infringement, I suggest you try and condense the list into prose, using your own words, and providing a reference to the site containing their aims. I'd help you but don't feel I have the time right now. Maybe later. Cheers! - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 12:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Juicearianism
Could you expand this beyond a definition. It sounds like a reasonable topic, but its current state and the cited lack of sources make me wary of supporting it right now. A single fact or piece of information that is not definition (and sourced from another source) could easily change my mind. - Mgm|(talk) 21:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Rare Disease Day


r ʨ  ana ɢ  talk/contribs has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Thank you for taking the time to dig up so many sources at the Rare Disease Day AfD. Your efforts are very helpful, and I will try to incorporate as many of the sources as I can (although I will probably need to ask a Danish speaker for help). Best, r ʨ  ana ɢ  talk/contribs 15:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm a Danish speaker, so feel free to ask me. You may also simply use Google Translate to auto-translate the pages into English. It obviously won't be a perfect translation, but it is usually good enough to make people understand what is being said. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 15:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Causes of Schizophrenia
Could you keep an eye on that page as well? There's a (new?) editor User:Notpayingthepsychiatrist that does some less than helpful changes there (see the article's talk page). Xasodfuih (talk) 21:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll try and keep an eye of that article as well, sure. Thanks for the heads up! - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 07:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

not sure what to do with this, can you show me
this looks like WP:ADVERT on a talk page Talk:Preventive medicine. see you currently online now Earlypsychosis (talk) 09:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I see it's already been handled. Just to let you know, though, WP:TALK states that you are allowed to delete material not relevant to improving the article (per the (...) subsection WP:TALK). So if you come across something on a talkpage that is clearly inappropriate content, go ahead and remove it. I suggest reading the WP:TALK guidelines in any case, it's a good guideline, though not a set-in-stone policy. Cheers, and happy editing! - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 09:36, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Janus Public Relations
WHat is wrong with this page?

It is well researched, factual and exposes a practice that is influencing our everyday lives?

Please explain.

Paul Le Compte —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paris1991 (talk • contribs) 12:25, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The page has/has several problems. It is completely original research, which is not allowed. You claim to have contacted people, but provide no reliable sources. There is absolutely nothing about this as found by searching Google (7 hits when using citation marks), so even if it may exist, it would fail WP:NOTABILITY criteria. I hope that answers your question. I'm sorry if this means that a lot of your time has been wasted; if indeed this is a noteworthy subject, please try and address the issues I raise. For instance, you could create the article in your own userspace User:Paris1991/Janus Public Relations, and if you can add sources and establish notability, have myself or another experienced editor have a look at it and see if it stands a chance as a proper article. I do, sincerely, doubt it, however. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 12:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Don Baker (political scientist)
Quick note: This is not a speedy for copyright violation. Nationmaster is one of the sites who copy Wikipedia rather than the other way around. _ Mgm|(talk) 11:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know, I obviously had no idea! They detail copyright in their FAQ, but I see that it is, indeed, copied. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 13:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello
I noticed in your "about me" section that you are a PhD student with knowledge of psychoses, drug abuse, and statistics. I beleive that statistics is all the more important in psychology due to the subjective nature of diagnosis. Also, pharmaceutical research is more difficult in my opinion because of the ethical issues and a strong placebo effect. All the best. Mwalla (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)mwalla

Almost Charlotte
Hi. What indications of importance? They played for three years, released one single, and have a compilation album on their own label and one track on another album. How does that meet WP:BAND? Is one of the members a star I haven't heard of? Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, the article's been speedily deleted, so I guess it's a moot point; but an article describing (as I seem to recall that it did) album/single releases and being featured on compilation albums is not, in my best opinion, a candidate for speedy deletion. In order to meet the A7 criterion, the article must give no "indication of why the band is important". The albums and compilations are, at least, an indication. Whether or not the band then meets WP:BAND is a separate question, but that is not to be handled by a speedy deletion, but by WP:PROD and WP:AFD. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 07:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, OK, as you say a moot point - I didn't see much "indication of importance". It wasn't me that re-speedied; I planned to wait for your reply and then consider whether to AfD. In fact I think it was also verging on spam - the author's name suggested a connection, and the reference linked to the record label which wouldn't have objected to selling you a CD. I thought it was odd that an article should pop up for such a long-defunct band. Anyway, it's gone now. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it certainly was odd for an old band like that to all of a sudden be deemed important, so I agree it probably wasn't notable. In any case, I'm glad that you brought this to my attention - I by no means claim to be infallible, so I actually prefer it when people tell me if they think I've misapplied some policy or other. Cheers! - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 10:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Roland Sapsford

 * Completely understand your revert on the party name, apologies, however wouldn't an internal link to the New Zealand parliament be a good idea as I see you removed that too? Regards. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 11:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * My apologies, I missed that you had done other edits as well - my bad. I've reverted the part that was my mistake. Thanks for the heads up! - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 11:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

SlimVirgin
You've been reported as a suspected sockpuppet of SlimVirgin. I'm sure that will last as long as the new holocaust Monicawhines (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)article. Make my day.
 * I consider your report a case of WP:POINTy WP:VANDALISM. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 10:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Monicawhines
Yeesh, this person really seems to have taken a liking to you. I thought I'd let you know that I filed a report on WP:AIV on your behalf. Matt (talk) 10:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I don't mind having disagreements with the person regarding the article - heck, if the AfD community deems me to be wrong, that's fine with me. But making personal attacks on me through accusing me of sockpuppetry is crossing the line. So thanks again! - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 10:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Joachim Boldsen
--Dravecky (talk) 02:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion
Please check the history again. The "article" was a declarative sentence followed by someone's idea of a "smiling sun" gif. No meaningful content whatsoever. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * It's OK. I felt (and still do based on the current version) that it falls under A3.  AFAIC, anyone researching the subject knows that the place is a Spanish amusement park.  It's kind of like opening the article about Disneyland from a third-party perspective and seeing, "Disneyland is a theme park in Anaheim, California."  Makes the project look bad.  :)  It's been tagged and should grow.  In fact, I think the place was an inspiration for Disneyland.--PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Donald Marriott
Survive a deadly diease and become a top 100 in the Nation tennis player? Top 10 in New Jersey in Boys 12 and under while playing bald and having radiation? This is so "notable"! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thricen (talk • contribs) 18:36, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It may be impressive, but the achievements fall flat of WP:ATHLETE and WP:BIO. However, this isn't the place for this discussion, the deletion debate is. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 18:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Peter Lundin
Hello, I stumbled upon this article today and noticed that it may not meet English Wikipedia notability requirements, therefore I may nominate it for deletion. Also, I noticed that when you created the page in 2007 an unreferenced tag was included. This is dismaying as it puts the responsibility of providing sources for a BLP on other editors. Could you please revisit it and establish notability by adding proper sources? Thank you,  momoricks   (make my day)  04:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. I think he is definitely notable, so I'll establish this with some sources in a couple of days' time, time permitting. As for the unreferenced tag I put there when creating the article, this is because I pretty much translated the article from the Danish Wikipedia article; I do agree with your concern, though. Like I said, I'll try and fix it shortly (not today, though, too tired), and then I'll be happy to debate it further if you still have notability concerns. Cheers! - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 20:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * That sounds great to me. Thanks!  momoricks   (make my day)  01:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree that it looks much better. Thanks again!  momoricks   (make my day)  23:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for replacing the category. I'd never encountered that before. Once I finish copyediting the article, I'll post questions/issues on the talk page. The main concern I have right now is Lundin's classification as a mass murderer. His crimes do not match the English Wikipedia definition. Perhaps it has a different definition in Denmark? Thanks,  momoricks   (make my day)  00:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

hi lilac
Sorry for my last message I was just playing with my friend and was going to take the comment off myself after she read it. I will be more constructive, sorry for again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrSmith23448 (talk • contribs) 09:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

NGC
I am totally ew to wikipedia and as such made a big mess out of my first article (namibia gaming community). My apologies for that. Since the NGC has an official forum, wikipedia automatically redflags the article. What should I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SandSpyderX (talk • contribs) 12:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You would have to establish that it may be notable, which there is no indications of at present. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 12:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

please help me
How do I remove messages from my talk page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edit523 (talk • contribs) 11:08, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You just delete them. I know the messages you are talking about are warnings. You are allowed to remove warnings, granted that you understand them and decide to abide. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after deleting the warnings, the warnings will still count, and you will be blocked promptly from editing. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 11:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

sorry
sorry about that. bit new to this.

have a good day!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex mcd777 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

furryblobs
sorry lilac soul i am new to wikipedia i did not know about the sandbox until now thanks for letting me know now i can mess around with out spoiling the brilliance of wikipedia. i did not know that i was vandalising and i didn't realise it saved to the whole internet thanks again from furryblobs —Preceding unsigned comment added by Furryblobs (talk • contribs) 20:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

invitation
You're invited to sign up as a founding member, at WikiProject Council/Proposals ! :) doncram (talk) 06:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

tags
is it okay to use unoffical tags ...my guess is that its is not okay, but what about talk pages?

like this tag example Earlypsychosis (talk) 05:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know how this works, but I agree with you that I'm fairly certain that it isn't okay. The problem is that everyone can create a tag, but it looks more official than just text; thus it looks more official, which is problematic when consensus isn't established about the content of the tag - be it on the talkpage or on the article proper. I suggest just putting your concern in normal text. You may want to check out the village pump to find out what to do if you want your tag to be "officially" recognized - in particular, I think you should check out (post at) the section WP:VPP or, perhaps, WP:VPR. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 06:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

thanks for your advice. Will check it out Earlypsychosis (talk) 08:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello Lilac Soul :)
Lilac Soul.... Your Random :) No I Am Dont Reply :L —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chatterbox-Cowboy (talk • contribs) 06:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Uhm. Okay??? - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 11:36, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Bling

 * and thank you also for your tidy up of Camperdown Cemetery :-) Amandajm (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Rasmussen
Now that he'll become NATO SG on 1 August, what'll happen in Denmark? Will the other Rasmussen simply take over with at most a few minor changes to the cabinet, or will something more relevant happen? And does this increase the Social Democrats' chances at the next election? — Nightstallion 14:26, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It is expected that Lars Løkke Rasmussen will take over as prime minister tomorrow (Sunday 5th April), so of course we'll need a new minister of finance. Speculation is that it will probably be a minor change to the cabinet at first, and then perhaps a larger change once things have settled down. The opposition is demanding new elections, but that almost certainly won't happen. Polls are that Lars Løkke Rasmussen is much less popular than the Social Democrats' leader, Helle Thorning-Schmidt, but some analysts think that's comparing apples to oranges, since it's comparing a second-in-line to a first-in-line, and that it will change once people know Lars as the first-in-line. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 15:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Mh. And what do you expect? — Nightstallion 22:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Much the same. I expect that employment minister Claus Hjort Frederiksen will become the new minister of finance, and that someone who isn't currently a minister will take over his position; either that, or a current minister of a smaller ministry taking that position, and then an outsider taking the smaller ministry. There won't be an election, I'm sure of that. Though the opposition wants one, Lars Løkke is by no means required to hold one as he doesn't have a majority against him in parliament, and an election now would probably be won by the opposition, so why should he call an election? - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 06:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Pronunciation
Hi Lilac Soul, I understand that but two wrongs don't make a right, and not only should the link be corrected, but the filename should be also. Before I reverted it, I noted this on the other editor's talk page here. Cheers. &mdash; Deon555talkI'm BACK!  07:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I think the wrong of having a redlink for a pronunciation file is greater than the wrong of having a filename with a misspelled name point to the right place. I do agree, though, that we should correct this - but let's do it in the right order - changing the filename first so that people won't encounter a disruptive redlink on a page that is likely to be high visibility due to his appointment as the next NATO secretary general. I'll have a look at moving it. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 07:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately one must be an administrator to move a file. There are two options, ask an admin to move it, or re-upload it and list the old one at MfD (the second being preferred). Nevertheless, I'll see if I can find a spare admin on IRC. Cheers &mdash; Deon555talkI'm BACK!  07:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I've reuploaded and will list for deletion - we may have to keep it for copyright purposes, though, I don't know. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 07:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's why I wasn't willing to upload it myself. Upon talking to User:Prodego on IRC, it appears admin's can't even do it anymore... ah the wonders of MediaWiki :). Anyway, thanks for your help re this. Cheers &mdash; Deon555talkI'm BACK!  07:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

added some outcome studies to early psychosis
Earlypsychosis (talk) 11:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Hearing Voices Movement
this has the potential to be a good article but needs a serious work over - a more balanced NPOV and in line citations. Earlypsychosis (talk) 11:20, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Harry Potter
If they were something then other then minor edits, I would have. R7604 (talk) 06:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Your signature
How did you add that link to your edit count? I tried, but it won't let me add  to my sig. -Garrett W. (T/C) 15:16, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you can't do that, but luckily you can just use a template. My signature is, quite simply: -Lilac Soul
 * There are plenty of other user templates (don't forget to subst). They all have in common that you must put your username aftername the templatename as an option for it to work (e.g. . They look like this:
 * user: Lilac Soul
 * user0: Lilac Soul (talk)
 * user1 plus: Lilac Soul (talk • contribs | [/wiki/User:?action=history&limit=5 UHx ] • [/wiki/User_talk:?action=history&limit=5 UtHx ] | [/wiki/User_talk:?action=edit UtE ] • [/wiki/User_talk:?action=edit&section=new Ut+ ] )
 * user2: Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count )
 * user2a: Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count )
 * user3: Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • [ logs ] )
 * user3-small: Lilac Soul (talk· contribs· [ logs ] )
 * user4: Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • email)
 * user5: Lilac Soul ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs  · [/wiki/Special:Log/move?user=  page moves  ] · block user  · [  block log  ] )
 * user6: Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count • [ logs ] • [/wiki/Special:Log/move?user= page moves ] • [ block log ] • email)
 * user7: Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count • [ logs ] • email )
 * user8: Lilac Soul (talk· contribs· count· email)
 * user9: Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count)
 * user10: Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count • [ logs ])
 * user11: Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count • • [ block log ])
 * user12:  (talk • contribs • [/wiki/Special:Log/move?user= page moves ] • block user • [/wiki/Special:Log/block?page=User: block log ] )
 * user13: Lilac Soul ( talk · contribs · [ logs ] · [ block log ] )
 * user14: Lilac Soul ( talk · contribs · global contribs  ·  logs  · [ block log ] )
 * user15: Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count • [ logs] • [/wiki/Special:Log/move?user= page moves ] • [ block log] • summary)
 * user16: <span id="Lilac Soul" class="plainlinks">Lilac Soul (talk • message • contribs • [ page moves ] • deleted contribs • summary • count •  • [ logs ] •  [ block log ] • block  • email)


 * user17: Lilac Soul ( talk · contribs · [ logs ] · email)
 * user19: Lilac Soul ( talk · contribs · global contribs  ·  page moves  ·  user creation  · [ block log ] )
 * user20: <span id="Lilac Soul" class="plainlinks">Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count • [ logs ] • [/wiki/Special:Log/move?user= page moves ] • [ block log ])
 * user21: <span id="Lilac Soul" class="plainlinks">Lilac Soul (talk·<span title="Contributions: Lilac Soul">contribs ·<span title="Deleted contributions: Lilac Soul">deleted contribs ·[/wiki/Special:Log/move?user= <span title="Page moves: Lilac Soul"> page moves ]·<span title="Block User:Lilac Soul">block user ·[ <span title="Logs: Lilac Soul" style="color:#002bb8">logs ]·[ <span title="Blocklog: Lilac Soul" style="color:#002bb8">block log ]·ban···· )


 * I hope you find one that you like. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 18:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

-Garrett W. (T/C) 20:16, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see. But what about WP:SIG?


 * Hmm. Dunno. I'm not transcluding the template since I subst it, but, hitherto unbeknownst to me, WP:SIG discourages subst'ing. I'll think about it, and perhaps I'll change my signature because of this... - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 18:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

-Garrett W. (Talk/Contribs) 23:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yours isn't a pure transclusion, yes, but the only difference with subst-ing is that the template source is included rather than linked to. Thus, many of the points in WP:SIG still apply to subst-ed sigs. Just FYI.


 * I've decided it's better to comply with policy, even if nobody has ever complained about my signature. It is now no longer a substed template. As you'll notice, however, it doesn't have the content you originally asked about, either. I guess the content wasn't really that important anyway. Thanks for the heads up! -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 20:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

I just reviewed the policy about subst-ing in sigs, and it looks to me like there shouldn't be a problem with it if the resulting markup (1) is within the 255-character limit, and (2) provides some additional benefit over a raw signature. FWIW, that's my opinion on the policy. The only thing I don't know about is how substed sigs are handled on the backend, and if doing so could have any measurable negative impact on operations. -Garrett W. (Talk / Contribs / PM) 22:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Was just going through my contribs and I saw that I had never replied to your last message.

Ice Hockey World Championships
Will you be interested to join the discussion on topic of Ice Hockey World Championships and whether medal count for Russia/USSR and Czech Republic/Czechoslovakia should be grouped together. The evidence I've provided from a reliable source  in support of this argument  is being rejected and there is seems to be a questionNeutral point of view. Please join in. Andreyx109 (talk) 19:17, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

2008–09 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season
Thanks for your editorial contributions to 2008–09 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season, which is now a WP:GA.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Anders Fogh Rasmussen
Excuse me sir, but that Anders is not in any of the film is a complete lie. The two documentary movies are particularly interesting because they reveal Anders and his government as war criminals not following the Geneva conventions, this might be interesting for the general public to know since he is now chairman for NATO. The journalist of "Den hemmelige krig" was prosecuted for misinformation and Anders government answered with a 300 page long report. The journalist was later found not guilty. I was not aware that Wikipedia in this sense is suppressing liberty of speech and censoring crucial background information of general interest, just because you happen to have wicked political views... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.185.28.192 (talk) 13:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think Anders Fogh Rasmussen is one of the worst things to have happened to Denmark in recent times, but my own political views are, just as yours, completely irrelevant to a Wikipedia article. However, some of the points you raise here could certainly be considered important - they require reliable sources, of course, and I don't see why they'd belong in a filmography section; but they could, perhaps, be of interest to the readers of the article if presented neutrally. However, this discussion does not belong on my talkpage, so please refer to the discussion I've started on the article's talkpage. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) • I'm watching this page so just reply to me right here! 05:40, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

what's up?
CS vandalizing Frederik 6.? No way —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.215.89.49 (talk) 14:59, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you're talking about... Seems to have to do with some edits back in May? -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) • I'm watching this page so just reply to me right here! 17:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi
I was reading the talk page for NWN script and saw your name. Just wanted to let you know I use your script generator all the time and it rocks! This has nothing to do with Wikipedia, just thought I'd express my appreciate. thx1138 (talk) 18:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Well thank you very much :-) -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 19:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Josef Tal
Thanks for your correction. Etan J. Tal 13:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Etan J. Tal (talk • contribs)
 * You're welcome. It was a small edit, after all. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 16:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

NEADS/Dogs for Deaf and Disabled Americans
Hi Lilac Soul, I'm the creator of the NEADS/Dogs for Deaf and Disabled Americans page. I saw that you moved the page to Dogs for Deaf and Disabled Americans. The name of the organization is NEADS, with 'Dogs for Deaf and Disabled Americans' as a kind of subtitle, so having the page named that might confuse people. I know that wikipedia does not like '/', so I changed it to: NEADS (Dogs for Deaf and Disabled Americans). I think that accurately shows the organization's title, but makes it a little less clunky for wikipedia. For more information on teh organization's name, I've added some discussion to the NEADS talk page...

Hope this helps! Thanks, Lisaanimal --Lisaanimal (talk) 20:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Just an idea
Hey, i was used to make modules on nwn, many using your script generator. Now im trying to make modules using dragon age toolset, is quite similar, but the scripts are diferents and hard to find when you need them, i know you are very busy, but here's is an idea, to make a script generator for dragon age newbie scripters, why dont you think about it?

regards

Fernando —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fsoup (talk • contribs) 19:32, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the suggestion, but I'm not involved in Dragon Age at all, neither as a player nor as a scripter. Sorry. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 22:28, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Lilac Soul! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Jens Kramer Mikkelsen -
 * 2) Lars Engberg -
 * 3) Martin Geertsen -
 * 4) Dario Campeotto -
 * 5) Torben Mark Pedersen -
 * 6) Jonas Warrer -
 * 7) Martin Kirketerp -


 * Done and done. Always fun to reply to a bot... -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 09:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

A Scripting Question
First off, great job on the script generator, it has helped me out considerably! I have a lot of fun building modules for my friends to play, and the scripting process in the pain the rear sometimes. The generator has made it so much faster and easier. My question is concerning scripting for the first Neverwinter Nights. I am trying to build a massive module, which will probally need to entail more then one. So, my question is, how do you can have you module end, and load another one, as they do in the NWN game itself.

Thank you, Darth Stitch


 * It's fairly simple, really. Just three lines of script which will move all players currently connected to the module to the next module. Just replace ModuleName with, of course, the actual module name. You must use the filename, not the internal name:

Hope that helps. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 17:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, thank you, that helps a lot!! Now, here is the tricky part, if it is even possible. Will this save any changes made to the module, or allow them to return to that module later? My original idea was to build my massive module as seperate zones. Kind of in the spirit of Morrowind, a massive open-ended adventure. Rather than have hundreds of areas, I want to make seperate zones. can it be done? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.255.149.176 (talk) 22:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No changes are saved to the module. If you need to carry information around from module to module, you will have to do so with local variables or undroppable items. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 06:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

OKay, thank ya very much! I already been setting up the variables just in case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.255.149.176 (talk) 16:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I guess I didn't reply completely to your question. Your players will of course be able to return to that module later, if you script them to, but it'll be reset except for whatever you're able to achieve with local variable checks and such. NPCs will be respawned (except, of course, that you can just kill them off by scripting through local variable checks as well). -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 21:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Michael Gambon
Hello. Lately I see you've edited the page of Sir Gambon. I hope you understand me better than the User Marttene, or whatever. You have removed filmography awards saying that this does not make sense on the page, because they already have their own. I hope you understand this message that I put the major awards, like most actors filmographies. Thank you.--88.28.60.99 (talk) 20:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I have, as far as I remember, not made any edits about filmography awards. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 20:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Geertsen2005.JPG
File:Geertsen2005.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Martin Geertsen under kommunalvalgkampen 2005.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Gallery tag
Hi Carsten, You placed a 'cleanup-gallery' tag onto Cycle Friendly Awards. Would you mind having a look at the talk page of that article? Thanks! By the way, I don't want to start a discussion with you here, but want to draw your attention to the talk page where that tag is most meaningfully discussed.  Schwede 66  06:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism on Tandja Mamadou
What was vandalised? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.88.124 (talk) 01:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You would claim that this is a valid edit? -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 17:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Harry Potter: Evanna Lynch
WikiProject Harry Potter has been rather inactive recently. I've been working on the Evanna Lynch article lately, and have based it off the featured article Emma Watson. I thought I'd ask if you would like to collaborate on the article, as part of a possible WikiProject revival. Leave your response at the article's talk page. Thanks! Alex Douglas (talk) 11:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kvickly Extra.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Kvickly Extra.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of There Goes My Baby (film)


The article There Goes My Baby (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable film. no critical review can be found in a national news source.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinithehat (talk) 18:32, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Luzhkov
Hello. You deleted the information about the letter. Was it a mistake? --Quantum666 (talk) 10:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was a mistake, apparently caused by the two of us editing simultanously. I apologize and have undone my edit so that your addition is now included. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 11:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok. Thanks. --Quantum666 (talk) 11:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Dead link ?
Gordon Nuttall - Ref [24] Nuttall faces fraud and corruption trial The Sydney Morning Herald Online - 'Nuttall faces fraud and corruption trial' - AAP (18 January 2010) - Seems to be dead at this end. - Regards,  Cablehorn (talk) 01:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Fixed ! Thanks - Cablehorn (talk) 01:13, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Glad to hear it. Don't know what the problem was - it worked fine when I clicked it. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 09:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Madison_Nguyen approval
I reverted your approval of edits to the Madison_Nguyen page. I'd encourage you to check out my reasoning, which I spelled out on Talk:Madison_Nguyen and weigh in. Jokeboy (talk) 23:04, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Your reasoning looks okay. I only accepted the revision because it didn't appear to be vandalism. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 08:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

WHY is my disney born in spain section being deleted???
first i make a section on walt disney being born in spain which i said were just LEGENDS not facts. and it has been deleted cause i didnt provide a source. now that i have provided a source its saying im creating vandalism? why isnt my section being published? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.79.40.88 (talk) 05:30, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Your additions are being deleted because Wikipedia does not include speculative content unless it is well sourced. Sources must be reliable, which your source was not. I apologize for calling your edits vandalism - the contents were not, but I misconstrued your continued addition of previously removed content as vandalous. I now see that you were doing this in good faith, and apologize for calling it vandalism. It does not, however, belong on Wikipedia. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 08:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Append: I now see you have a Guardian source. I'll accept your revision. Whether or not it should be in the article, well, if it gets reverted again, you should discuss on the article's talk page whether or not it should be in or out, rather than engaging in edit warring. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 08:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Robert Spitzer edit
Hello. I don't understand these changes by you. I made my edit analogous to uncontested entries like this. The way it's now, it's not only missing information but also lacking uniformity. Regards – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 13:54, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi. Well, it has to do with MOS:DAB guidelines. In particular, only one bluelink should exist per line, and in most cases, links should not be piped in disambiguation pages. As for removing info, this is because it doesn't really belong on disambig pages. Quoting MOS:DAB, avoiding distracting information. In brief, the pages should contain only disambiguation content. The O'Connor disambiguation page may have been uncontested when you looked at it, but apparently, it wasn't set up according to Wikipedia standards. I hope my explanation helps. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 16:58, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, the O'Connor page needs further info because it often will not be clear from the article who the particular person is. However, if an article is called X (psychiatrist) and another X (footballer), you'll most likely know from that description alone which one you were looking for. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 17:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi Lilac Soul,

I think your decison on English Mastiff editing is not fair, the guy who added information refers a kennel which is a trustable resource. Just my thoughts... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.59.185.225 (talk) 20:11, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

edit war
Dear Lilac Soul

I do not understand why I am in edit war. I added a lot of sources into John Hunyadi, and somebody always wanted to delete it. It was vandalism. The theme was nationality/ethnicity. I also commented it on its talk page. Fakirbakir (talk) 13:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It was not vandalism. It was a content dispute. You believe one thing, the other person believed another. I agree that removal of your references was not acceptable, but it was still an edit war and violating WP:3RR, something you have been warned about in the past. I know it is tempting to get involved in such edit wars when you believe you are absolutely right, but the proper approach is always to discuss first if your edits are reverted. Then, if consensus is reached that your edits are correct and should stay, then you have grounds for getting your contributions marked as correct. I'm not taking a side on whether you or the IP editor is correct - I am just telling you that edit warring is against the principles of Wikipedia. I do not, however, mean to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You appear to want to make Wikipedia better, which is something I think we all benefit from in the end. So thank you for all your efforts in making Wikipedia better, but please understand that edit warring is problematic. Happy Sunday, and happy Halloween if you're into that sort of thing :-) -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 13:25, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Article names
I have no intention of getting involved in it, but please note that this move is against wiki policy, specifically WP:COMMONNAME. Cheers, 212.10.95.14 (talk) 15:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems that you are correct, so I have undone my move by moving it back. Thanks. -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) • I'm watching this page so just reply to me right here! 06:02, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your helpful edits to the new article I created, at The Mystery of a Hansom Cab. Much appreciated! ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 20:37, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It was really a rather minor edit (disambiguation), but you're welcome! -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 01:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Testing... 1-2-3... Testing
Trying out the editing of wikipedia, so you could say that I'm a n00b... looked at your user page for good examples of wiki code. Thanks! ObserverPattern (talk) 14:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC)ObserverPattern
 * You're more than welcome. I copied much of the code from someone else back in the day, so happy to pass it on. And welcome to Wikipedia! -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 18:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for backing up my edit
Hey, just wanted to say thanks for backing up my edit on the Natalie Portman page from that bot or whatever that was removing it. ItsDrewMiller (talk) 05:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Next election in Denmark listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next election in Denmark. Since you had some involvement with the Next election in Denmark redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 01:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Next Danish parliamentary election for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Danish parliamentary election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Next Danish parliamentary election (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Alexander Henderson Award (2nd nomination)
In a revisit of a previous AFD you commented on, you might be interested in Articles for deletion/Alexander Henderson Award (2nd nomination).--GrapedApe (talk) 03:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

File:ReferendumAgeScatter.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ReferendumAgeScatter.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:51, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 12:36, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 09:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kvickly.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Kvickly.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Health intervention for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Health intervention is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Health intervention until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Daask (talk) 09:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Semper Ardens for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Semper Ardens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Semper Ardens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aranya (talk) 03:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Kevin Doyle (singer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Doyle (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kevin Doyle (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Schools in San Marino


A tag has been placed on Category:Schools in San Marino indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:ReferendumAgeScatter.JPG


The file File:ReferendumAgeScatter.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused raster image not used to create to corresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution purposes"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HouseBlastertalk 15:17, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

File:ReferendumAgeScatter.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ReferendumAgeScatter.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. HouseBlastertalk 16:41, 18 February 2022 (UTC)