Talk:Formula of Love: O+T=＜3

"Push & Pull" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Push &. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 30 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. ✗ plicit  01:15, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 26 December 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn per the nominator's comment of 23:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC) below. —&#8288;&#8202;&#8288;BarrelProof (talk) 02:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Formula of Love: O+T=＜3 → Formula of Love: O+T=Heart – Per WP:TSC, a Wikipedia article can't have the character "<". I think replacing the "<3" to "Heart" can keep the sense of the title of the album. HDORS (talk | contribs) 23:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose. The article is currently using https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+FF1C, "Fullwidth Less-Than Sign", which isn't the forbidden character <.  The same guideline you link, WP:TSC, explicitly bars symbols and uses the heart symbol as an example.  Maybe the current hack isn't much better, but if we're going to skirt the guidelines, it's more accurate to the title which is using "<3" rather than heart directly.  SnowFire (talk) 02:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: "Formula of Love: O+T=Heart" was the title I made for a draft of this article which I have once sent to review before the article was approved with "O+T=＜3", and I think it can work as a redirect to the current title because when I made my draft I was not aware that ＜ could be used as an alternative to <. Alejandro Herrera B. (talk) 18:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm sorry. I thought that the title of the article was using the character "<" instead of https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+FF1C . I now agree with you that we should keep the title as it is and not move it like I reequested before. HDORS (talk | contribs) 23:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose per SnowFire. The relevant section of WP:TSC here is descriptive, not prescriptive, so saying that an article should be moved because of it makes no sense. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)