Talk:GB Railfreight

Merger proposal
We seem to have two articles running about the same company. This has come about as First GBRf has gone back to its original name of GB Railfreight.

I propose changing the First GBRf article into a redirect to GB Railfreight with a section about its ownership under the First Group.

Philphos (talk) 13:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I have no objections to this, having 2 articles for the same company seems pointless. --Tommietomato (talk) 14:28, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on GB Railfreight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120819061351/http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmtran/145/145wec03.htm to http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmtran/145/145wec03.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004215148/http://www.firstgroup.com/latest_news/?id=003551 to http://www.firstgroup.com/latest_news/?id=003551
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141018204741/http://www.railexpress.co.uk/news/yeoman-highlander-to-return-to-uk to http://www.railexpress.co.uk/news/yeoman-highlander-to-return-to-uk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Do GBRF Have BR Class 20
I have question GBFR have any British Rail Class 20 and if so what are there numbers?--I Like The british Rail Class 483 (talk) 17:10, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Class 99 locomotive order additional request.
Recently, GBRf, Beacon Rail, and Stadler Euro Dual class 99 locomotive orders have been posted.

But it's still outdated, don't you want to update it?

And the class 69 locomotive has no content and is poorly maintained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.76.112.91 (talk) 01:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)