Talk:GNU Free Documentation License

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on GNU Free Documentation License. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130530230813/http://www.informationweek.com/verizon-settles-open-source-software-law/206904096 to http://www.informationweek.com/verizon-settles-open-source-software-law/206904096

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 23:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * فف 105.40.179.43 (talk) 18:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * GFDL (English).ogg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:22, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 * GFDL (English).ogg

References for Conditions
The licence conditions are listed in the text. Can we add references to the GFDL text where the conditions can be found? Example:  All previous authors of the work must be attributed  --D-Kuru (talk) 11:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 April 2024 - minor grammatical edit
In the section: == List of projects that use the GFDL ==

For the Last.fm bullet item: * Last.fm – artists descriptions are under GFDL

Instead of "artists descriptions", it should be one of the below: - artist descriptions - artists' descriptions - descriptions of artists

I would lean towards the first: artist descriptions. Thanks. BackspaceSomethingElse (talk) 23:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ I replaced it with your first suggestion, thanks. Jamedeus (talk) 23:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)