Talk:Gateway Protection Programme

Peer review suggested improvements
The article's peer review resulted in the following suggestions, which I have annotated so as to show how I (or other editors) have responded:


 * Lead: I think you mean "actual" rather than "eventual" Fixed
 * Programme details
 * Why is the first sentence there? It doesn't seem to have any purpose. I disagree - it serves a purpose as far as I can see
 * Second sentence far too long, needs to be split after "Home Office". Then: "If they meet the criteria they are brought..." etc. But can you specify whose criteria you mean? Fixed
 * History
 * There is a long gap in time in your discussion of the quota number. We have a sentence about Blunkett's intentions to set the quota at 1,000 during the second year of operation (2002–03), then suddenly we are told the 2008–09 figure. At the very least there needs to be a linking sentence or two after "slow to take off", stating that despite such-and-such pressures and because of this-and-that factors, the number remained at 500 per annum Fixed
 * You should reverse the order of paragraphs, so that the ancient history is discussed before the more recent stuff. What were the dates of the Mandate Refugee Scheme (Palestine 1948?) and the Ten or More Plan? Fixed order, added available details
 * Refugees resettled under the programme: There is no need to repeat in the text exactly the information provided in the table - which really ought to be in this section instead of the Burmese picture, which might go elsewhere. So the sentences: "In 2004, 150 refugees were resettled. This fell to 50 in 2005 but rose to 355 in 2006 and 485 in 2007" are unnecessary. What seems missing from the section is any reason why the figures were initially so low. Fixed; reason for low numbers given in history section
 * Resettlement locations: 15 local authorities out of how many? It would be good to know. Fixed
 * General point: MOS encourages the use of no-break spaces. See WP:NBSP Fixed

If you have any comments on this, please leave them below. Cordless Larry (talk) 00:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gateway Protection Programme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141031173903/http://unitedkingdom.iom.int/resettlement-and-family-reunification to http://unitedkingdom.iom.int/resettlement-and-family-reunification

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:55, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gateway Protection Programme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090926052215/http://www.gddc.pt/direitos-humanos/outraspubPDF/Asolo%20Ingles/0.%20Asile%20%281-170%29.pdf to http://www.gddc.pt/direitos-humanos/outraspubPDF/Asolo%20Ingles/0.%20Asile%20%281-170%29.pdf
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130419211827/http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2006/01/19/52432/few-councils-take-up-un-scheme.html to http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2006/01/19/52432/few-councils-take-up-un-scheme.html
 * Added tag to http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/lifestyle/real_life_2_658/norfolk_is_a_gateway_to_a_safer_way_of_life_1_1109785

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:34, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gateway Protection Programme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402213607/http://www.employabilityforum.co.uk/documents/UKBA-refugee-integration-strategy-2009.pdf to http://www.employabilityforum.co.uk/documents/UKBA-refugee-integration-strategy-2009.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)