Talk:Gene therapy for epilepsy

Untitled
This article's content was copied on Nov 11, 2013 from my page |Gene Therapy and its Application in Epilepsy and my original sandbox page | stem cell and gene therapies for treating epilepsy to correct for the title changes. Since the transfer of information there have only been minor edits on the this wiki page.

Peer Reviews
1. Quality of Information: 2

The information included in this article is factual and covers current research regarding the topic.

2. Article size: 2

The article meets the size requirements.

3. Readability: 2

This article is easy to read.

4. Refs: 2

The author used more than the required number of references.

5. Links: 2

There are many links to other wikipedia pages throughout the article.

6. Responsive to comments: 2

The author was very responsive to edits and comments made by other users.

7. Formatting: 2

The article is well organized.

8. Writing: 2

This is well written and easy to understand.

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

The author's username includes his real name.

10. Outstanding?: 1

This article is interesting, but could use visual aids or more creativity.

_______________

Total: 19 out of 20

Catherine Kwon (talk) 05:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your review and I'll be sure to try incorporating some images. AlexLee90 (talk)

1. Quality of Information: 2

2. Article size: 2

3. Readability: 2

4. Refs: 2

5. Links: 2

6. Responsive to comments: 2

7. Formatting: 2

8. Writing: 2

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

10. Outstanding?: 2

_______________

Total: 20 out of 20

Great article: Very recent sources, good organization. I recommend to read through it one more time for very small grammar/punctuation/capitalization issues. Also, think about adding a picture or two.

Rachel Candace Law (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your review! AlexLee90 (talk)

1. Quality of Information: 2

2. Article size: 2

3. Readability: 2

4. Refs: 2

5. Links: 2

6. Responsive to comments: 2

7. Formatting: 2

8. Writing: 2

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

10. Outstanding?: 2

_______________

Total: 20 out of 20

Great article. Very easy to follow. But what is CARNEY under the major challenges?

Thuy Le (talk) 23:27, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your review. I have gone back and remove the typos. AlexLee90 (talk)