Talk:General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Kotelawala Defence University Flag.jpg

Orphaned references in General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "auto": From National School of Business Management:  From Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery:  From Nalanda College, Colombo:  From Patrick Mendis:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:17, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

UGC approval of KDU
This university is not governed by the UGC, and it has not been approved by the university grant commission through a university order or any other regulation. However, some editors claim that it was approved by UGC despite the fact that it contained incorrect references.Chathu69 (talk) 11:37, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Association of Commonwealth Universities not an accreditation institute it is a international network of universities. KDU is only member of Association of Commonwealth Universities. I have corrected this point in the article.Chathu69 (talk) 12:04, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Controversies section
I've added all university-related controversies to a new section. I believe it will support in maintaining the article's neutral point of view NPOV.

This section needs cleaning up to remove editorial writing and bring it to line with more encyclopedic writing which is the standard in Wikipedia. Cossde (talk) 07:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Controversy
Please stop disruptive editing and re-adding disputed content without taking the WP:BURDEN to gain consensus. You have failed to give a controversy and saying that you or a group oppose it does NOT make it a controversy. Putting a citation and then writing creative interpretations and your opinions cannot be used as a loophole to avoid WP:OR and WP:NPOV guidelines. - UmdP  13:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)