Talk:Gibson's Bakery v. Oberlin College/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator:

Reviewer: Voorts (talk · contribs) 20:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

I am quickfailing this nomination under 2b (WP:RS) and 4 (WP:NPOV). The article is slanted toward the POV of the bakery and conservative commentators, while Oberlin's position gets more limited coverage. For example, Oberlin's First Amendment argument is mentioned, but no secondary sources regarding that position or commentators agreeing with that position are discussed in the article. Additionally, several conservative blogs/op-eds are cited for factual propositions, such as:, https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/06/18/oberlin-and-the-price-of-wokeness/], ,. Per WP:RSBIAS, while bias does not make a source unreliable, factual claims should usually be to non-biased sources. Additionally, WP:RSPS requires the Washington Examiner (e.g., ) to be attributed. RSPS also considers Forbes contributors posts (e.g., ) to be GUNREL.

Other than the above, the article is well-written and follows the MOS at a GA level of quality. Although not required for GA, some of the references could use some cleanup. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)