User talk:Voorts
| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30Auto-archiving period: 5 days  |
 |
|
Guild of Copy Editors 2023 Annual Report[edit]
Guild of Copy Editors 2023 Annual Report
 Our 2023 Annual Report is now ready for review.
Highlights:
– Your Guild coordinators:
Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
May music[edit]
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Regarding your comment in the MoS discussion: I also once "voted" per someone else, but in general I recommend to provide your own thoughts rather than only referring to those of others. I supported the view that Voceditenore detailed for Mozart:
- "Infoboxes are an integral part of editing and more importantly of the reader experience. They allow us to cater both to the reader who is looking only for the basic facts concerning the person quickly and easily presented and to those who want a lengthy and more detailed artcle. The "repetition" argument is simply a canard. The Encyclopædia Britannica doesn't have a problem with "repetition" via infoboxes [1]. Nor does the Australian Dictionary of Biography [2].
- The other "oppose" reasons are equally weak.
- They contain "unimportant factoids"?? The dates and places of birth and death, the subject's primary occupation are not factoids, they are highly salient and essential facts of a biography ...
- There is no evidence for the assertion that vandalism is harder to detect in infoboxes than in the article text ...
- The notion that an infobox attracts less valuable editors and its absence will somehow make them edit the article text instead is equally preposterous and patronizing ..."
Please read it full length, and tell me here - and better all in the discussion - what you think? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- On the bicentenary of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, I remember our recent uplifting choral concert in pictures, on my user page and in my concerts (leading to the two at the church's article). The closest was in the paper. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Today is the Feast of the Ascension for which Bach composed his oratorio, - perhaps watch a bit how the closing movement was performed in Bach's church. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, Gerda. I've not given Bach's vocal works as much attention as I ought to; I tend to stick with what I know and love from Bach (the Casals recording of the Cello Suites). voorts (talk/contributions) 00:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Voorts, I don't like "ought to" ;) - Did you listen a bit? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, Gerda. I've not given Bach's vocal works as much attention as I ought to; I tend to stick with what I know and love from Bach (the Casals recording of the Cello Suites). voorts (talk/contributions) 00:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Carabus mariettii (marietti) stefaniruspolii[edit]
You reverted my edit--what I thought was a correction--moving the article from "marietti" to "mariettii." You said "marietti" is the corrct spelling, according to the source. I was just going by the other subspecies. Does this mean that all of those subspecies--and the species itself--need to be moved? Uporządnicki (talk) 13:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- I hadn't noticed that there were other subspecies and that the species name is spelled the way you that you had changed the title to. I think the one "i" is correct based on the RS cited and a brief search of Google/Google scholar, but I'm not a species-naming expert, so perhaps a WP:RMPM discussion should be started at Carabus mariettii for the species and all of the subspecies. voorts (talk/contributions) 14:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- OK, if I get to it, I'll open a discussion. But it'll probably be at a project page, rather than one species or genus article--which might not be seen. Uporządnicki (talk) 18:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
May 8: WikiWednesday Salon with new Executive Director[edit]
| May 8: WikiWednesday @ Prime Produce | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly WikiWednesday Salon at Prime Produce in Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan, with an online-based participation option also available. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome! This special WikiWednesday will feature a welcome session and beginning of a listening tour by the newly appointed executive director of Wikimedia NYC, the first staff member leading our local non-profit. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. Meeting info:
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Addie Viola Smith[edit]
On 11 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Addie Viola Smith, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Addie Viola Smith was the first female Foreign Service officer to serve under the United States Department of Commerce? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Addie Viola Smith. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Addie Viola Smith), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.