Talk:Glass/GA1


 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kostas20142 (talk · contribs) 14:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

I will happily take up and review the article nominated --Kostas20142 (talk) 14:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Although on hold period has expired, I will delay it 3 days to allow further improvements before deciding whether to pass or fail it. --Kostas20142 (talk) 18:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

comments

 * A large number of citations is missing. Please address all "citation needed" and templates.
 * Last paragraph of History of silicate glass section needs copyediting. Ideally should be rewritten however omitting the first "are" at "scientists are observing...." would work since from what I understand, these scientists are developing the techniques described. Done -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 18:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Cups2.png should be moved to color section (ideally somewhere on the right). It fits better there and is more relevant. Done -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 13:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * In optical properties section, the images (except the magnifying glass) appear to be irrelevant. To be more specific, two different types of drinking glass and another image whose relevance isn't explained are included, whereas an images showing optical fiber, one of the most important application of these properties isn't. I would recommend including one (why not from that article) and removing the wine glasses (or moving them somewhere else). Done -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 18:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * do you think that Aqueous solutions section could be expanded a bit?? At least to present some applications of this if something more is not possible within the seven days of "on hold" period. Done -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 13:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * For the same paragraph, The example part is a bit difficult to understand for someone who doesn't have in-depth knowledge on the topic. Maybe an explanation or at least a link would be beneficial. ✅ -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 19:17, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I noticed that in some areas of the article chemical compounds are named and in some others only the symbols are included (some of which are mentioned for the first time). Could you please check it??


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.