Talk:Global Alliance in Management Education

"CEMS MIM as the first supra-national M.Sc" This role goes to ESCP Europe, who has had an international MIM MSc programme for longer.

Can you please give the date for when did ESCP started its international MIM MSc programme ?Pvk (talk) 16:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

The tone of the article is written very much like an advertisment.

The name of the page should be CEMS - Global Alliance in Management Education. And CEMS should automatically redirect here. Anyone can make those changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.132.3.9 (talk) 10:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

This is a signed comment on the same subject : The Official full title of the association is : "CEMS - The Global Alliance in Management Education". How do we edit the title of the page ? Pvk (talk) 16:22, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

I found the answer on the page Moving_a_page Pvk (talk) 16:29, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 November 2017
Could you please add the "Egypt - American University in Cairo - Cairo" to the list of schools that are a part of the CEMS Global Alliance? ref. https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogertrapp/2017/11/14/a-big-opportunity-to-develop-leaders-for-the-middle-east-and-africa/#52684ed8457e

Could you please change "In 2016, CEMS refused to take part in the yearly FT Ranking. The program made its came back in 2017 at the 9th place." to "In 2016, the CEMS MIM did not appear in the FT Ranking. In 2017 the CEMS MIM was ranked in 9th place." Because the original version is providing information that is not public knowledge (phrase 1) and uses poor English (phrase 2).

Could you please change "To date, over 12,000 CEMS students have graduated and gone on to become CEMS alumni." to "To date, over 13,000 CEMS students have graduated and gone on to become CEMS alumni." Because there is another class of over 1k students that has graduated.

Could you please add under Rankings "The CEMS MIM participated in the inagural MIM Ranking by The Economist, placing 9th." ref. http://www.economist.com/whichmba/MiM/2017/Ranking

Thank you. Rarosi321 (talk) 09:47, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * . You have four requests here. The first request looks fine so I added it. The second and third are not sourced and really, that text should be removed entirely because it's promotional. The fourth request is also promotional. Do any of these listings help a reader's understanding of the subject? I don't believe so.  City O f  Silver  20:32, 22 November 2017 (UTC)