Talk:Grade I listed buildings in Bath and North East Somerset

663 GV I buildings?
I think this number - 663 - must be seriously mistaken, and the source used has taken a really big mistake. Leaving apart that this would mean 10% of all the listed buildings - more than Greater London, that has just 569 GV I buildings, Heritage Counts provides a number of 99 (updated 2006), while IoE states they are 98  (updated 2001). Unless some confirmation is found that there are well more than 100, I'd say 663 should be removed. Thoughts?--Aldux (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * My source for this number (as cited in the article) is Owning a Listed Building (BANES) where it says "Bath & North East Somerset has 663 Grade I listed buildings, one of the highest concentrations in the country". As discussed elsewhere I believe the number is because of the number of buildings - where one EH listing can cover a whole road of 20 + buildings. As BANES has responsibility under the act for enforcement I don't see why their figure should not be believed.&mdash; Rod talk 16:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I had noticed the source, actually; only, it seemed so enormous and distant from EH's numbers that it made me suspect an error - after all, even the most reliable sources can make quite impressive errors. If the difference resides in the reason you stated, wouldn't it be better to provide both numbers - the buildings and the official number of listed entries - instead of just one? Just my personal 2 cents; I'm currently too occupied with my work and with Suffolk listings to do anything else except than bugging you. Ciao,--Aldux (talk) 17:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Bug away. I've added a note to the article saying c 100 EH listings. I'm aiming to come back to this list later, but a few others to do first.&mdash; Rod talk 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Converting OSGB36 (OS grid refs) to coords on this list and others
I have started a discussion about converting the OSGB36 (OS grid refs) on this list and others to use Template:Coord, as I think this offers advantages for users worldwide (who may be unfamiliar with the OS system) and the use of Template:GeoGroupTemplate to enable mapping on googlemaps etc. I have been told that a bot could be tasked to do this, however this would be quite a significant change and would not want to do it without consensus. If anyone has any comments could they join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geographical coordinates.&mdash; Rod talk 16:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Grade I listed buildings in Bath and North East Somerset. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080130105206/http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1995/Uksi_19950493_en_1.htm to http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1995/Uksi_19950493_en_1.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/bathnes/leisureandculture/tourismandtravel/areainformation/default.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101123105000/http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/environmentandplanning/Conservation/listedbuildingsinformationadvice/Pages/owningalistedbuilding.aspx to http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/ENVIRONMENTANDPLANNING/CONSERVATION/LISTEDBUILDINGSINFORMATIONADVICE/Pages/owningalistedbuilding.aspx
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/worldheritage/2.3Des.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/worldheritage/3Append.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)