Talk:Grooveshark

music-lawsuit-grooveshark
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/24/us-music-lawsuit-grooveshark-idUSKBN0NF21120150424 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.170.88.56 (talk) 20:26, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Clone, and web filtering
Almost all the big network security firms now categorize the clone site that went live on 5 May 2015 as one of several categories: Piracy/Copyright Concerns, Illegal or Unethical, or Hacking. Rainnews.com reported the clone was set up by a Swedish hacker (referred to an article in The Verge), and that the hacker had captured 90 percent of the old site's database. That made it easy to call the clone as being media piracy, etc., and most filtering solution providers fell in line with the definition or used their categorization definitions to apply the categorization in their services. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:509:3801:D038:21A0:D897:AF0F (talk) 17:54, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

death of Josh Greenberg
Ok, I just realized someone added a one line statement regarding the death of Josh Greenberg, a site co-founder. But is this really relevant to the history of the company itself? After all, there is no indication of foul play or any reason to suspect his death has to do with his connection to the company. I know this is an item of interest to some people but this doesn't seem like the right place for it. PseudoOne (talk) 21:59, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree with you PseudoOne. I don't think that information is very pertinent as it stands, but it could be reasoned that it was added in the fact that he was still in the role of CTO at the time of his death. I did make edits to his page, Josh Greenberg, to address this so feel free to edit, update or change as required. AChrisTurner (talk) 15:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)