Talk:Habib Bank Limited

Untitled
A list of the members of the board of directors is not encyclopedic information The bank has a web site for that sort of thing. I have removed it. I'd recommend a check for other inappropriate material. DGG (talk) 09:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Habib bank logo.JPG
Image:Habib bank logo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Controversy
Habib Bank Limited has also been said to be involved in large sums of money transactions by the Pakistani spy agency the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI). This is further supported by the recent book by L.K. Advani "My Country My Life" in which he points out that the ISI's dealings in drugs overseas mainly involves transactions through Habib Bank Limited and the funds are then transferred by various bank channels to separatist groups in various states in India. -->Not referenced and seemed like a defaming act rather than fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.245.152 (talk) 04:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)