Talk:HappyCow

Comments on HappyCow article

 * First draft created G.C.E. Galotta (talk) 22:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * With help from the teahouse (thanks again User:Maproom) fixed non-independant sources and promotional fluff G.C.E. Galotta (talk) 11:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * DrStrauss: Which parts should have more references, in order to remove the refimprove-flag? G.C.E. Galotta (talk) 12:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I've added specific tags to help. Dr Strauss   talk  12:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The statements about the other topics and other available features (like forum etc.) could be confirmed by checking the appropriate page on happycow.net (e.g. the topics can be found here: https://www.happycow.net/vegtopics) but I guess it will be hard to find an independent source for them. Same thing for the number of listings, reviews, etc. (which are published here: https://www.happycow.net/browse). Any advice? G.C.E. Galotta (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * two things I would change: "well established" - to keep that you'll probably need some stats on number of posts etc and a source, "Reviews of these listings number over 150,000" - just a simple citation source is needed.  Dr Strauss   talk  16:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * How about this stats page: https://www.happycow.net/reports/stats for the "Reviews of these listings number over 150,000"? And maybe just remove the "well established" for the blog and forum?