Talk:Helog

Notability & references
The article cites no sources that demonstrate notability. In an edit summary the creating editor cited widespread geographical operations as demonstrative of notability, but that appears to be a view that has no basis in the guidelines. Please don't remove the tag again until the notability of the topic is demonstrated within the article.

Bongo  matic  08:09, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I've updated the article and added some citations. Are these enough to justify notability? My own feeling is that Helog seems at least as notable as some of the lesser defunct companies which are listed here and have their own Wikipedia articles. - Meticulo (talk) 12:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)


 * And I've removed the templates about notability and proposed deletion for now. Hope that's okay. - Meticulo (talk) 00:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Michael Sedgley (talk) 09:26, 19 September 2019 (UTC)I added some references for credibility.Michael Sedgley (talk) 09:26, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Helog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111111094743/http://www.helog-global.com/en/menu_main/intern%3A33/about-helog/boxnewsshow1-hovercraft to http://www.helog-global.com/en/menu_main/intern%3A33/about-helog/boxnewsshow1-hovercraft
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110905022425/http://www.sierraexpressmedia.com/archives/25812 to http://www.sierraexpressmedia.com/archives/25812

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)