Talk:Henry Pering Pellew Crease

Biography assessment rating comment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 16:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Followed the 11 steps, so let's see if it's good.Stevecudmore 03:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Judge's Bench Book Notes of Hall Trial
These notes may have content useful for this article. -- KenWalker | Talk 23:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Failed GA nomination
My primary reasons for failing this GA nomination is because the article looks a bit short (I think you could write more about an Attorney General and Supreme Court justice), and also because there are a lack of in-line citations in the article. Please see WP:REF, and take a look at the referencing style of some other GA articles. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of July 8, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Yes
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Yes
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Yes
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Yes
 * 5. Article stability? Yes
 * 6. Images?: Yes

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status. — bobanny 07:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

GA Sweeps (kept)
This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Ruslik 13:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)